These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21895396)

  • 1. Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).
    Farmer TA; Monaghan P; Misyak JB; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1318-25. PubMed ID: 21895396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading.
    Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):806-14. PubMed ID: 19379050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen.
    Staub A; Grant M; Clifton C; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1326-8. PubMed ID: 21895397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonological typicality and sentence processing.
    Tanenhaus MK; Hare M
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 17207653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension.
    Farmer TA; Christiansen MH; Monaghan P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Aug; 103(32):12203-8. PubMed ID: 16882728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.
    Yates M; Friend J; Ploetz DM
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):685-92. PubMed ID: 17826758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading.
    Paterson KB; Liversedge SP; Davis CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19145008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonological representation of words in working memory during sentence reading.
    Inhoff AW; Connie C; Eiter B; Radach R; Heller D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):320-5. PubMed ID: 15260200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.
    Arciuli J; Cupples L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):920-48. PubMed ID: 16608755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of thematic and lexical priming on readers' eye movements.
    Hyönä J
    Scand J Psychol; 1993 Dec; 34(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 8303233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contributions of decoding skill and lexical knowledge to the development of irregular word reading.
    Nash HM; Davies R; Ricketts J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jan; 49(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 36951753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
    Folk JR; Morris RK
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time course of phonological and orthographic processing of acronyms in reading: evidence from eye movements.
    Slattery TJ; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Jun; 13(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 17048723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing the role of phonology in reading: focus on sentence processing.
    Lee CH
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Aug; 38(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 19048378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading.
    Miellet S; Sparrow L
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):299-310. PubMed ID: 15172547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing modifier-head agreement in reading: evidence for a delayed effect of agreement.
    Vainio S; Hyöna J; Pajunen A
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):329-40. PubMed ID: 18426064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading.
    Meng X; Jian J; Shu H; Tian X; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1219():91-102. PubMed ID: 18539265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese.
    Zhou X; Marslen-Wilson W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1245-65. PubMed ID: 11009256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Literacy effects on language and vision: emergent effects from an amodal shared resource (ASR) computational model.
    Smith AC; Monaghan P; Huettig F
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Dec; 75():28-54. PubMed ID: 25171049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.