These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21895568)

  • 1. Representational pseudoneglect in an auditory-driven spatial working memory task.
    Brooks JL; Logie RH; McIntosh R; Sala SD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Nov; 64(11):2168-80. PubMed ID: 21895568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural-verbal description.
    Brooks JL; Brandimonte MA
    Cogn Process; 2014 May; 15(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 24317838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time to imagine space: a chronometric exploration of representational neglect.
    Bartolomeo P; Bachoud-Lévi AC; Azouvi P; Chokron S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1249-57. PubMed ID: 15949509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect.
    Masson N; Pesenti M; Dormal V
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1925-32. PubMed ID: 23774183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A lateralized bias in mental imagery: evidence for representational pseudoneglect.
    McGeorge P; Beschin N; Colnaghi A; Rusconi ML; Della Sala S
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun; 421(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 17574752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.
    van Dijck JP; Abrahamse EL; Acar F; Ketels B; Fias W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1500-13. PubMed ID: 24749504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Items on the left are better remembered.
    Della Sala S; Darling S; Logie RH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):848-55. PubMed ID: 20306371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right-sided representational neglect after left brain damage in a case without visuospatial working memory deficits.
    van Dijck JP; Gevers W; Lafosse C; Fias W
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2283-93. PubMed ID: 23643245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visuospatial bootstrapping: evidence for binding of verbal and spatial information in working memory.
    Darling S; Havelka J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 19921598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.
    Aniulis E; Churches O; Thomas NA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3381-3387. PubMed ID: 27461110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preserved visuo-spatial transformations in representational neglect.
    Della Sala S; Logie RH; Beschin N; Denis M
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(10):1358-64. PubMed ID: 15193943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gaze direction affects visuo-spatial short-term memory.
    Carlei C; Kerzel D
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Oct; 90():63-8. PubMed ID: 24998909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pseudoneglect of males and females on a spatial short-term memory task.
    Nalçaci E; Ciçek M; Kalaycioglu C; Yavuzer S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Feb; 84(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 9132740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: simulating 'spatial' neglect in healthy subjects.
    Göbel SM; Calabria M; Farnè A; Rossetti Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):860-8. PubMed ID: 16260006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory involvement in spatial text processing: what advantages are gained from extended learning and visuo-spatial strategies?
    Meneghetti C; De Beni R; Gyselinck V; Pazzaglia F
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):499-518. PubMed ID: 21752002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.
    Orr CA; Nicholls ME
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(3):384-93. PubMed ID: 15827740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.