197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21896662)
1. Correlation between carotid bifurcation calcium burden on non-enhanced CT and percentage stenosis, as confirmed by digital subtraction angiography.
Sarikaya B; Lohman B; McKinney AM; Gadani S; Irfan M; Lucato L
Br J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 85(1015):e284-92. PubMed ID: 21896662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography.
McKinney AM; Casey SO; Teksam M; Lucato LT; Smith M; Truwit CL; Kieffer S
Neuroradiology; 2005 Jan; 47(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15650832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multidetector helical angio CT oblique reconstructions orthogonal to internal carotid artery for preoperative evaluation of stenosis. A prospective study of comparison with color Doppler US, digital subtraction angiography and intraoperative data.
De Monti M; Ghilardi G; Caverni L; Ceriani L; Soldi S; Massaro F; Buchbut R; Gobatti D; Scorza R
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Aug; 51(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 12900719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reappraisal of velocity criteria for carotid bulb/internal carotid artery stenosis utilizing high-resolution B-mode ultrasound validated with computed tomography angiography.
Shaalan WE; Wahlgren CM; Desai T; Piano G; Skelly C; Bassiouny HS
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jul; 48(1):104-12; discussion 112-3. PubMed ID: 18486416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. B-mode ultrasound measurement of carotid bifurcation stenoses: is it reliable?
MacKenzie KS; French-Sherry E; Burns K; Pooley T; Bassiouny HS
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2002; 36(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 11951099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
Silvennoinen HM; Ikonen S; Soinne L; Railo M; Valanne L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Rotational digital subtraction angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis].
Biederer J; Link J; Peter D; Kopp U; Heller M
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 10598163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy?
Cosottini M; Calabrese R; Puglioli M; Zampa V; Michelassi C; Ortori S; Murri L; Bartolozzi C
Eur Radiol; 2003 Mar; 13(3):571-81. PubMed ID: 12594561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetric assessment of the carotid bifurcation: an alternative concept to stenosis grading.
Miralles M; Arrébola M; Bruguer S; Lago A; Lara R
Ann Vasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 29(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 25591486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal carotid duplex velocity criteria for defining the severity of carotid in-stent restenosis.
AbuRahma AF; Abu-Halimah S; Bensenhaver J; Dean LS; Keiffer T; Emmett M; Flaherty S
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Sep; 48(3):589-94. PubMed ID: 18586444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Spiral CT angiography versus DSA in detection of carotid stenoses].
Link J; Müller-Hülsbeck S; Wesner F; Steffens JC; Brossmann J; Heller M
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1018-22. PubMed ID: 9092221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suitable methods of measuring acceleration time in the diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis.
Iizuka K; Takekawa H; Iwasaki A; Igarashi H; Suzuki K; Kobayashi S; Tsukui D; Hirata K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Apr; 47(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 31912319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: can CTA overcome the confusion?
Bucek RA; Puchner S; Haumer M; Rand T; Minar E; Lammer J
J Endovasc Ther; 2006 Aug; 13(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 16928157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The measurement of stenosis of the internal carotid artery: comparison of doppler ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography and the 3D CT volume rendering technique.
Flis V; Tetickovic E; Breznik S; Stirn B; Matela J; Miksić K
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2004; 116 Suppl 2():51-5. PubMed ID: 15506311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximum stenosis of extracranial internal carotid artery: effect of luminal morphology on stenosis measurement by using CT angiography and conventional DSA.
Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ono K; Murata Y; Takahashi M; Suginohara K; Uemura S
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 11719682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
