124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898099)
1. Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae.
Torcasio A; Zhang X; Van Oosterwyck H; Duyck J; van Lenthe GH
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 May; 11(5):743-50. PubMed ID: 21898099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D characterization of bone strains in the rat tibia loading model.
Torcasio A; Zhang X; Duyck J; van Lenthe GH
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Mar; 11(3-4):403-10. PubMed ID: 21688057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of Young's modulus of loaded implants on bone remodeling: an experimental and numerical study in the goat knee.
Stoppie N; Van Oosterwyck H; Jansen J; Wolke J; Wevers M; Naert I
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Sep; 90(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 18615463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peri-implant bone adaptations to overloading in rat tibiae: experimental investigations and numerical predictions.
Piccinini M; Cugnoni J; Botsis J; Ammann P; Wiskott A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1444-1453. PubMed ID: 26864329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of bony ingrowth to the distribution of stress and strain parameters surrounding a porous-coated implant.
Qin YX; McLeod KJ; Guilak F; Chiang FP; Rubin CT
J Orthop Res; 1996 Nov; 14(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 8982127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mode III cleavage of a coin-shaped titanium implant in bone: effect of friction and crack propagation.
Mathieu V; Vayron R; Barthel E; Dalmas D; Soffer E; Anagnostou F; Haiat G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Apr; 8():194-203. PubMed ID: 22402166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parathyroid hormone 1-34 enhances titanium implant anchorage in low-density trabecular bone: a correlative micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
Gabet Y; Müller R; Levy J; Dimarchi R; Chorev M; Bab I; Kohavi D
Bone; 2006 Aug; 39(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 16617039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography.
Morinaga K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18384402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
Petrie CS; Williams JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards validation of computational analyses of peri-implant displacements by means of experimentally obtained displacement maps.
Basler SE; Mueller TL; Christen D; Wirth AJ; Muller R; van Lenthe GH
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Feb; 14(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 21170767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae.
Masuda T; Salvi GE; Offenbacher S; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):472-85. PubMed ID: 9274076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant.
Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histodynamics of bone tissue formation around immediately loaded cylindrical implants in the rabbit.
Vandamme K; Naert I; Geris L; Sloten JV; Puers R; Duyck J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 17517061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
