These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898100)
1. Time-dependent behavior of cartilage surrounding a metal implant for full-thickness cartilage defects of various sizes: a finite element study. Manda K; Eriksson A Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 May; 11(5):731-42. PubMed ID: 21898100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element simulations of a focal knee resurfacing implant applied to localized cartilage defects in a sheep model. Manda K; Ryd L; Eriksson A J Biomech; 2011 Mar; 44(5):794-801. PubMed ID: 21300358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant size and mechanical properties influence the failure of the adhesive bond between cartilage implants and native tissue in a finite element analysis. Vahdati A; Wagner DR J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(9):1554-60. PubMed ID: 23618130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical validation of finite element models for two silicone metacarpophalangeal joint implants. Hussein AI; Stranart JC; Meguid SA; Bogoch ER J Biomech Eng; 2011 Feb; 133(2):024501. PubMed ID: 21280884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling of constrained articular cartilage growth in an intact knee with focal knee resurfacing metal implant. Manda K; Eriksson A Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2014 Jun; 13(3):599-613. PubMed ID: 23955432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repair of periprosthetic pelvis defects with porous metal implants: a finite element study. Levine DL; Dharia MA; Siggelkow E; Crowninshield RD; Degroff DA; Wentz DH J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021006. PubMed ID: 20370243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cartilage thickness distribution affects computational model predictions of cervical spine facet contact parameters. Womack W; Ayturk UM; Puttlitz CM J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jan; 133(1):011009. PubMed ID: 21186899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of collagen orientation and depth-dependent fixed charge densities of cartilage on mechanical behavior of chondrocytes. Korhonen RK; Julkunen P; Wilson W; Herzog W J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021003. PubMed ID: 18412490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of mechanical behavior of articular cartilage by fibril reinforced poroelastic models. Li L; Shirazi-Adl A; Buschmann MD Biorheology; 2003; 40(1-3):227-33. PubMed ID: 12454409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model. Cao L; Youn I; Guilak F; Setton LA J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):766-71. PubMed ID: 16995764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alterations in mechanical behaviour of articular cartilage due to changes in depth varying material properties--a nonhomogeneous poroelastic model study. Li LP; Shirazi-Adl A; Buschmann MD Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Feb; 5(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 12186733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A fiber reinforced poroelastic model of nanoindentation of porcine costal cartilage: a combined experimental and finite element approach. Gupta S; Lin J; Ashby P; Pruitt L J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Aug; 2(4):326-37; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19627839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]