These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898195)

  • 1. Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study.
    Medelnik J; Hertrich K; Steinhäuser-Andresen S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):261-78. PubMed ID: 21898195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
    Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatability and reproducibility of landmarks--a three-dimensional computed tomography study.
    Titiz I; Laubinger M; Keller T; Hertrich K; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):276-86. PubMed ID: 21566086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
    Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.
    Liang X; Lambrichts I; Sun Y; Denis K; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 19423257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison--an in vitro study.
    Hofmann E; Medelnik J; Fink M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 21378093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear accuracy and reliability of volume data sets acquired by two CBCT-devices and an MSCT using virtual models: a comparative in-vitro study.
    Wikner J; Hanken H; Eulenburg C; Heiland M; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Riecke B; Friedrich RE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25936361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The topography of displaced canines: a 3D-CT study.
    Hofmann E; Rodich M; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):247-52, 254-60. PubMed ID: 21826539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements.
    Loubele M; Van Assche N; Carpentier K; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 17900939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
    Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e678-88. PubMed ID: 22322503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of three-dimensional computed tomography measurements for Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Gaia BF; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; Costa FF; Cavalcanti MG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 43(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 23867257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of different cone beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography scan parameters on virtual three-dimensional model accuracy using a highly precise ex vivo evaluation method.
    Matta RE; von Wilmowsky C; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Neukam FW; Adler W; Wichmann M; Bergauer B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 27017101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.