411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898389)
1. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Activating KRAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as independent predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.
Yen LC; Uen YH; Wu DC; Lu CY; Yu FJ; Wu IC; Lin SR; Wang JY
Ann Surg; 2010 Feb; 251(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 20010090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Peeters M; Price TJ; Cervantes A; Sobrero AF; Ducreux M; Hotko Y; André T; Chan E; Lordick F; Punt CJ; Strickland AH; Wilson G; Ciuleanu TE; Roman L; Van Cutsem E; Tzekova V; Collins S; Oliner KS; Rong A; Gansert J
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4706-13. PubMed ID: 20921462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.
Van Cutsem E; Köhne CH; Láng I; Folprecht G; Nowacki MP; Cascinu S; Shchepotin I; Maurel J; Cunningham D; Tejpar S; Schlichting M; Zubel A; Celik I; Rougier P; Ciardiello F
J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(15):2011-9. PubMed ID: 21502544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective.
Blank PR; Moch H; Szucs TD; Schwenkglenks M
Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 17(19):6338-46. PubMed ID: 21807639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.
Van Cutsem E; Lenz HJ; Köhne CH; Heinemann V; Tejpar S; Melezínek I; Beier F; Stroh C; Rougier P; van Krieken JH; Ciardiello F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(7):692-700. PubMed ID: 25605843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Loupakis F; Pollina L; Stasi I; Ruzzo A; Scartozzi M; Santini D; Masi G; Graziano F; Cremolini C; Rulli E; Canestrari E; Funel N; Schiavon G; Petrini I; Magnani M; Tonini G; Campani D; Floriani I; Cascinu S; Falcone A
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 27(16):2622-9. PubMed ID: 19398573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mutant KRAS codon 12 and 13 alleles in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: assessment as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to panitumumab.
Peeters M; Douillard JY; Van Cutsem E; Siena S; Zhang K; Williams R; Wiezorek J
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Feb; 31(6):759-65. PubMed ID: 23182985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
László L
Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.
Mitchell EP; Piperdi B; Lacouture ME; Shearer H; Iannotti N; Pillai MV; Xu F; Yassine M
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2011 Dec; 10(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22000810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective analysis of KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 treatment regimens.
Huang MY; Chen MJ; Tsai HL; Kuo CH; Ma CJ; Hou MF; Chuang SC; Lin SR; Wang JY
Genet Mol Res; 2011 Oct; 10(4):3002-12. PubMed ID: 21968808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale Multicenter phase II study.
Colucci G; Giuliani F; Garufi C; Mattioli R; Manzione L; Russo A; Lopez M; Parrella P; Tommasi S; Copetti M; Daniele B; Pisconti S; Tuveri G; Silvestris N; Maiello E
Oncology; 2010; 79(5-6):415-22. PubMed ID: 21474966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phase II trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan for oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety based on KRAS mutation status (T-CORE0801).
Soeda H; Shimodaira H; Gamoh M; Ando H; Isobe H; Suto T; Takahashi S; Kakudo Y; Amagai K; Mori T; Watanabe M; Yamaguchi T; Kato S; Ishioka C
Oncology; 2014; 87(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 24968756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the specific mutation in KRAS codon 12 mutated tumors on treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab-based first-line therapy: a pooled analysis of three trials.
Modest DP; Brodowicz T; Stintzing S; Jung A; Neumann J; Laubender RP; Ocvirk J; Kurteva G; Papai Z; Knittelfelder R; Kirchner T; Heinemann V; Zielinski CC
Oncology; 2012; 83(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 22948721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
