109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898635)
1. Advantages of the population-based approach to pregnancy dating: results from 23,020 ultrasound examinations.
Økland I; Nakling J; Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 21898635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new population-based term prediction model vs. two traditional sample-based models: validation on 9046 ultrasound examinations.
Okland I; Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eggebø TM; Eik-Nes SH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 20560133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biases of traditional term prediction models: results from different sample-based models evaluated on 41 343 ultrasound examinations.
Økland I; Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 20533451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach.
Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 17557369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
Mul T; Mongelli M; Gardosi J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 8(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9014279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gestational age in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization: comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age.
Wennerholm UB; Bergh C; Hagberg H; Sultan B; Wennergren M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 12(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 9793188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: an independent method from estimated date of conception.
Salomon LJ; Pizzi C; Gasparrini A; Bernard JP; Ville Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19606401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lower accuracy in prediction of delivery date in Stockholm County following introduction of new guidelines.
Wessel H; Nyberg T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 27858960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound assessment of fetal biparietal diameter and femur length during normal pregnancy in Iranian women.
Beigi A; ZarrinKoub F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Jun; 69(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 10854865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of Parturition Time in Queens using Radiography and Ultrasonography.
Gatel L; Rault D; Chalvet-Monfray K; Saunders J; Buff S
Anat Histol Embryol; 2015 Aug; 44(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 25041169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Term prediction with ultrasound: evaluation of a new dating curve for biparietal diameter measurements.
Backe B; Nakling J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 16532907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonic measurement of biparietal diameter and femur in foetal age determination.
Dare FO; Smith NC; Smith P
West Afr J Med; 2004; 23(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 15171520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal age assessment based on 2nd trimester ultrasound in Africa and the effect of ethnicity.
Salpou D; Kiserud T; Rasmussen S; Johnsen SL
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Oct; 8():48. PubMed ID: 18973673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can biparietal diameter-to-femur length ratio be a useful sonographic marker for screening thanatophoric dysplasia since the first trimester? A literature review of case reports and a retrospective study based on 10,293 routine fetal biometry measurements.
Wang L; Takai Y; Baba K; Mikami Y; Saito M; Horiuchi I; Konno R; Takagi K; Seki H
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 56(3):374-378. PubMed ID: 28600053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 or 15-20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan.
Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Reilly M; Valentin L; Grunewald C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 24(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 15229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort.
Stirrup OT; Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Thilaganathan B;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 25052857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
