226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898638)
1. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study.
Kehl S; Schmidt U; Spaich S; Schild RL; Sütterlin M; Siemer J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 21898638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New sonographic method for fetuses with small abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21630187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound.
Schild RL; Fimmers R; Hansmann M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 16(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 11169329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new sonographic weight formula for fetuses Siemer J; Hilbert A; Hart N; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 19137495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods?
Siemer J; Peter W; Zollver H; Hart N; Müller A; Meurer B; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Good accuracy of ultrasound estimations of fetal weight performed by midwives.
Mattsson N; Rosendahl H; Luukkaala T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(6):688-92. PubMed ID: 17520400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels.
Siemer J; Egger N; Hart N; Meurer B; Müller A; Dathe O; Goecke T; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Apr; 29(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17602369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort.
Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Dias T; Cooper D; Thilaganathan B;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 44(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 24311473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased accuracy of fetal weight estimation with a gender-specific weight formula.
Siemer J; Wolf T; Hart N; Schrauder M; Meurer B; Goecker T; Beckmann MW; Schild RL
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2008; 24(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 18836268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight: a formula for a Pakistani population.
Munim S; Figueras F; Shah SM; Khan F; Gardosi J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Jun; 36(3):479-83. PubMed ID: 20598024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas.
Hasenoehrl G; Pohlhammer A; Gruber R; Staudach A; Steiner H
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Dec; 30(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 19544232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biometry and fetal weight estimation by two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography: an intraobserver and interobserver reliability and agreement study.
Lima JC; Miyague AH; Filho FM; Nastri CO; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 22102507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound imaging in the small fetus.
Schild RL; Maringa M; Siemer J; Meurer B; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schmid M; Hothorn T; Hansmann ME
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 18663765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods.
Lindell G; Marsál K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound.
Schild RL; Sachs C; Fimmers R; Gembruch U; Hansmann M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 14970995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal mid-thigh soft-tissue thickness: a novel method for fetal weight estimation.
Abuelghar W; Khairy A; El Bishry G; Ellaithy M; Abd-Elhamid T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1101-8. PubMed ID: 25009072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.
Schmidt U; Temerinac D; Bildstein K; Tuschy B; Mayer J; Sütterlin M; Siemer J; Kehl S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jul; 178():153-6. PubMed ID: 24802187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
