151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21898670)
1. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A New Breast Border Extraction and Contrast Enhancement Technique with Digital Mammogram Images for Improved Detection of Breast Cancer.
Hazarika M; Mahanta LB
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Aug; 19(8):2141-2148. PubMed ID: 30139217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An automated confirmatory system for analysis of mammograms.
Peng W; Mayorga RV; Hussein EM
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Mar; 125():134-44. PubMed ID: 26742491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental investigation on breast tissue classification based on statistical feature extraction of mammograms.
Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Jan; 31(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 17070012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic extraction of pectoral muscle in the MLO view of mammograms.
Feudjio CK; Klein J; Tiedeu A; Colot O
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(23):8493-515. PubMed ID: 24240510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of breast tissues using Moran's index and Geary's coefficient as texture signatures and SVM.
Braz Junior G; Cardoso de Paiva A; Corrêa Silva A; Cesar Muniz de Oliveira A
Comput Biol Med; 2009 Dec; 39(12):1063-72. PubMed ID: 19800057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
Vikhe PS; Thool VR
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Compression paddle tilt correction in full-field digital mammograms.
Kallenberg MG; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 22241616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recognizing architectural distortion in mammogram: a multiscale texture modeling approach with GMM.
Biswas SK; Mukherjee DP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 58(7):2023-30. PubMed ID: 21421429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Globally supported radial basis function based collocation method for evolution of level set in mass segmentation using mammograms.
Kashyap KL; Bajpai MK; Khanna P
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Aug; 87():22-37. PubMed ID: 28549292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Efficient Segmentation and Classification System in Medical Images Using Intuitionist Possibilistic Fuzzy C-Mean Clustering and Fuzzy SVM Algorithm.
Chowdhary CL; Mittal M; P K; Pattanaik PA; Marszalek Z
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 32668793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Independent component analysis and neural networks applied for classification of malignant, benign and normal tissue in digital mammography.
Campos LF; Silva AC; Barros AK
Methods Inf Med; 2007; 46(2):212-5. PubMed ID: 17347758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
