222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21899247)
1. Comparison of complication rates of porous anophthalmic orbital implants.
Ramey N; Gupta D; Price K; Husain A; Richard M; Woodward J
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 21899247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous orbital implants, wraps, and PEG placement in the pediatric population after enucleation.
Wang JK; Liao SL; Lin LL; Kao SC; Tseng HS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 144(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 17499206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants a 15-year experience of 802 cases.
Yoon JS; Lew H; Kim SJ; Lee SY
Ophthalmology; 2008 Mar; 115(3):566-572.e2. PubMed ID: 17854900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients.
Tabatabaee Z; Mazloumi M; Rajabi MT; Khalilzadeh O; Kassaee A; Moghimi S; Eftekhar H; Goldberg RA
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 20829725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orbital implants insertion to improve ocular prostheses motility.
Goiato MC; Haddad MF; dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Ribeiro Pdo P; Moreno A
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 20485072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orbital implants in enucleation surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Custer PL; Kennedy RH; Woog JJ; Kaltreider SA; Meyer DR
Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):2054-61. PubMed ID: 14522788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevention of exposure of porous orbital implants following enucleation.
Wang JK; Liao SL; Lai PC; Lin LL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 17109809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-stage explant-implant procedure of exposed porous orbital implants.
Toft PB; Rasmussen ML; Prause JU
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 20528784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent PEG placements.
Shoamanesh A; Pang NK; Oestreicher JH
Orbit; 2007 Sep; 26(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 17891645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric anophthalmic sockets and orbital implants: outcomes with polymer-coated implants.
Kirzhner M; Shildkrot Y; Haik BG; Qaddoumi I; Rodriguez-Galindo C; Wilson MW
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1300-4. PubMed ID: 23399376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrated orbital implants--a comparison of hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants.
Sadiq SA; Mengher LS; Lowry J; Downes R
Orbit; 2008; 27(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 18307145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures.
Jordan DR; Klapper SR; Gilberg SM
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 19(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12544793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Re: "comparison of the exposure rate of wrapped hydroxyapatite (Bio-Eye) versus unwrapped porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implants in enucleated patients".
Nasser QJ; Blaydon SM; Connor MA; Nakra T; Shepler TR; Neuhaus RW; Shore JW
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(5):391; author reply 391-2. PubMed ID: 21904174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and histopathologic review of 18 explanted porous polyethylene orbital implants.
Chuo JY; Dolman PJ; Ng TL; Buffam FV; White VA
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 19091412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Tolerance of porous polyethylene orbital implants in children].
Benatiya Andaloussi I; Bhallil S; Abdellaoui M; Chraibi F; Tahri H
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2012; (319):61-7. PubMed ID: 22550779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement.
Cheng MS; Liao SL; Lin LL
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 15364224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous and nonporous orbital implants for treating the anophthalmic socket: A meta-analysis of case series studies.
Schellini S; Jorge E; Sousa R; Burroughs J; El-Dib R
Orbit; 2016; 35(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 26928263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of mersilene mesh for wrapping of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: mid-term result.
Owji N; Mosallaei M; Taylor J
Orbit; 2012 Jun; 31(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 22551365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exposure rates of wrapped and unwrapped orbital implants following enucleation.
Li T; Shen J; Duffy MT
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Nov; 17(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 11766024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration.
Su GW; Yen MT
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):274-80. PubMed ID: 15266140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
