277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21900618)
1. Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ.
Friedlander LC; Roth SO; Gavenonis SC
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 21900618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies.
Abramovici G; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 21285337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia.
Port ER; Park A; Borgen PI; Morris E; Montgomery LL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1051-7. PubMed ID: 17206485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.
Sung JS; Malak SF; Bajaj P; Alis R; Dershaw DD; Morris EA
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):414-20. PubMed ID: 21900617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy-what is the clinical significance?
O'Driscoll D; Britton P; Bobrow L; Wishart GC; Sinnatamby R; Warren R
Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 11247699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening breast magnetic resonance imaging in women with atypia or lobular carcinoma in situ.
Schwartz T; Cyr A; Margenthaler J
J Surg Res; 2015 Feb; 193(2):519-22. PubMed ID: 25277350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonsurgical management of high-risk lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: can malignancy be ruled out safely with breast MRI?
Linda A; Zuiani C; Furlan A; Lorenzon M; Londero V; Girometti R; Bazzocchi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):272-80. PubMed ID: 22268168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience.
Orel SG; Rosen M; Mies C; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 16304093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics, Malignancy Rate, and Follow-up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Identified at Breast MR Imaging: Implications for MR Image Interpretation and Management.
Chikarmane SA; Birdwell RL; Poole PS; Sippo DA; Giess CS
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):707-15. PubMed ID: 27089027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Undiagnosed breast cancer at MR imaging: analysis of causes.
Pages EB; Millet I; Hoa D; Doyon FC; Taourel P
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 22523324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of patients diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ at needle core biopsy at a community-based outpatient facility.
Destounis SV; Murphy PF; Seifert PJ; Somerville PA; Arieno AL; Morgan RC; Young WL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 22268169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up.
Hambly NM; Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Brennan S; Morris EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):218-24. PubMed ID: 21178070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
