444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21900952)
1. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a blinded hybrid device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Nissei DM-3000.
Tasker F; De Greeff A; Shennan AH
J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Sep; 24(9):609-16. PubMed ID: 20107491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Viera AJ; Hinderliter AL
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):335-8. PubMed ID: 17890973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Karpettas N; Protogerou A
J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Mar; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 19609285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Protogerou AD
J Hum Hypertens; 2008 Nov; 22(11):796-800. PubMed ID: 18596720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Oregon scientific BPW810 blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension Protocol.
Li L; Hui W; Jin Lan W
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Dec; 11(6):343-7. PubMed ID: 17106319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the Andon KD-575 automated blood pressure monitor according to the European society of hypertension international protocol in adults.
Pan F; Wan Y; Chen W; Li N; Tong W; Xu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2010 Jun; 15(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 20164739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Natalizi A; Gerosa PF; Frigerio M; Omboni S; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Andon KD-391 semiautomated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol.
Wan Y; Pan F; Liu Y; Liang Y; Yang Z; Zhao H; Xu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2009 Aug; 14(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 19512888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
