These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21901437)
21. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view. Senturia SD IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer review should continue after publication. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication. Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Select Crowd Review: A New, Innovative Review Process for the International Journal of Sports Medicine. Int J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 41(4):207. PubMed ID: 32162292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Program descriptions: information for authors and peer reviewers. Huston P; Elmslie T CMAJ; 1996 Oct; 155(8):1069-74. PubMed ID: 8873635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A case for instant peer review? Henneberg M Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6608):401. PubMed ID: 8945454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The dangers of advocacy in science. Gitzen RA Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5839):748. PubMed ID: 17690275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [How to reward and stimulate the task of reviewing scientific articles?]. Muccioli C; Campos M; Goldchmit M; Dantas PE; Bechara SJ; Costa VP Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(1):5. PubMed ID: 17505710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Editors are meant to be judges, not postmen. Michell B Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479-80; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Journals should set a new standard in transparency. Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Who is afraid of reviewers' comments? Or, why anything can be published and anything can be cited. Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Apr; 40(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 20486989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A case for instant peer review? Pillinger CT Nature; 1996 Dec; 384(6608):401. PubMed ID: 8945453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Scientific reporting guidelines]. Nylenna M Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]