These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21901646)

  • 1. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.
    Kocsor F; Rezneki R; Juhász S; Bereczkei T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21267643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are attractive facial characteristics peculiar to the sex of a face?
    Casey SJ; Mernagh M; Newell FN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):833-43. PubMed ID: 19132630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reported sexual desire predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic cues in women's faces.
    Jones BC; Little AC; Watkins CD; Welling LL; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1281-5. PubMed ID: 21213032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observer age and the social transmission of attractiveness in humans: Younger women are more influenced by the choices of popular others than older women.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Aug; 106(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 25314951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: an event-related potential experiment using a study-test paradigm.
    Zhang Y; Kong F; Chen H; Jackson T; Han L; Meng J; Yang Z; Gao J; Najam ul Hasan A
    J Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 89(11):1887-93. PubMed ID: 21805493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptions of human attractiveness comprising face and voice cues.
    Wells T; Baguley T; Sergeant M; Dunn A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Jul; 42(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 23358855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.
    Montoya RM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1315-31. PubMed ID: 18599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Facial attractiveness biases the perception of eye contact.
    Kloth N; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1906-18. PubMed ID: 21756185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beauty beyond compare: effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast.
    Cogan E; Parker S; Zellner DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 23244047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beauty is better pursued: effects of attractiveness in multiple-face tracking.
    Liu CH; Chen W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):553-64. PubMed ID: 22117090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Romantic relationship status biases memory of faces of attractive opposite-sex others: evidence from a reverse-correlation paradigm.
    Karremans JC; Dotsch R; Corneille O
    Cognition; 2011 Dec; 121(3):422-6. PubMed ID: 21903209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex typicality and attractiveness in childhood and adulthood: assessing their relationships from videos.
    Rieger G; Gygax L; Linsenmeier JA; Siler-Knogl A; Moskowitz DA; Bailey JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Feb; 40(1):143-54. PubMed ID: 19588237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex-dimorphic face shape preference in heterosexual and homosexual men and women.
    Glassenberg AN; Feinberg DR; Jones BC; Little AC; Debruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1289-96. PubMed ID: 19830539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Miscalibrations in judgements of attractiveness with cosmetics.
    Jones AL; Kramer RS; Ward R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2060-8. PubMed ID: 24670156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.
    Ishai A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Feb; 63(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 16759727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.