These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21901935)

  • 1. Compatibility relationships with simple lever tools.
    Müsseler J; Skottke EM
    Hum Factors; 2011 Aug; 53(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 21901935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial compatibility effects with tool use.
    Kunde W; Müsselar J; Heuer H
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 17702217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bimanual interference associated with handling different tool transformations.
    Massen C; Sattler C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):893-909. PubMed ID: 23148470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. S-R compatibility effects on motor potentials associated with hand and foot movements.
    Miller J
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):493-506. PubMed ID: 26544150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The locus of tool-transformation costs.
    Kunde W; Pfister R; Janczyk M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):703-14. PubMed ID: 22082214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of stimulus-response compatibility using a startling acoustic stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Feb; 78(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22099151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic imitation? Imitative compatibility affects responses at high perceptual load.
    Catmur C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 26569336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using tools with real and imagined tool movements.
    Müsseler J; Wühr P; Ziessler M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():515. PubMed ID: 24987379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor priming by movement observation with contralateral concurrent action execution.
    Itaguchi Y; Kaneko F
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():94-102. PubMed ID: 29195131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A choice reaction-time task in the rat: a new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses.
    Kaneko H; Tamura H; Kawashima T; Suzuki SS
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 174(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 16934882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 10946588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coordinative constraints in bimanual tool use.
    Massen C; Sattler C
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 206(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 20734035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-response compatibility with body parts: a study with hands.
    Lameira AP; Pereira A; Fraga-Filho RS; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2127-32. PubMed ID: 25893910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.
    Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):743-752. PubMed ID: 36720746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of directional response variables on eye-hand reaction times and decision time.
    Jacobson JM; Repperger DW; Goodyear C; Michel N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Feb; 62(1):195-208. PubMed ID: 3960661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological problems undermine tests of the ideo-motor conjecture.
    Jansson E; Wilson AD; Williams JH; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 182(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 17593359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.