These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21903214)

  • 1. Determining the optimal system-specific cut-off frequencies for filtering in-vitro upper extremity impact force and acceleration data by residual analysis.
    Burkhart TA; Dunning CE; Andrews DM
    J Biomech; 2011 Oct; 44(15):2728-31. PubMed ID: 21903214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of low pass filtering on joint moments from inverse dynamics: implications for injury prevention.
    Kristianslund E; Krosshaug T; van den Bogert AJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 22227316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of digital filtering on peak acceleration and force measurements for artistic gymnastics skills.
    Campbell RA; Bradshaw EJ; Ball N; Hunter A; Spratford W
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Aug; 38(16):1859-1868. PubMed ID: 32329647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Failure characteristics of the isolated distal radius in response to dynamic impact loading.
    Burkhart TA; Andrews DM; Dunning CE
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Jun; 30(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 22083972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multivariate injury risk criteria and injury probability scores for fractures to the distal radius.
    Burkhart TA; Andrews DM; Dunning CE
    J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 23352774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings.
    Redfern M; Hughes R; Chaffin D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1993 Jan; 8(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 23915829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal digital filtering requires a different cut-off frequency strategy for the determination of the higher derivatives.
    Giakas G; Baltzopoulos V
    J Biomech; 1997 Aug; 30(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 9239572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The rule of 1s for padding kinematic data prior to digital filtering: influence of sampling and filter cutoff frequencies.
    Howarth SJ; Callaghan JP
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):875-81. PubMed ID: 18462952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of measuring the kinematics of rising from a chair with accelerometers and gyroscopes.
    Boonstra MC; van der Slikke RM; Keijsers NL; van Lummel RC; de Waal Malefijt MC; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 16321638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic segment filtering procedure for processing non-stationary signals.
    Davis DJ; Challis JH
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 101():109619. PubMed ID: 31952818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determinations by modifying noise frequency spectrum between two consecutive wavelet-based low-pass filtering procedures.
    Chen HP; Liao HJ; Huang CM; Wang SC; Yu SN
    J Chromatogr A; 2010 Apr; 1217(17):2804-11. PubMed ID: 20227706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general solution for the time delay introduced by a low-pass Butterworth digital filter: An application to musculoskeletal modeling.
    Manal K; Rose W
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(3):678-81. PubMed ID: 16545388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital filtering of three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics: an assessment.
    Sinclair J; Taylor PJ; Hobbs SJ
    J Hum Kinet; 2013 Dec; 39():25-36. PubMed ID: 24511338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital Butterworth filter for subtracting noise from low magnitude surface electromyogram.
    Mello RG; Oliveira LF; Nadal J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Jul; 87(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17548125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal digital filters for analyzing the mid-latency auditory P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Liljander S; Holm A; Keski-Säntti P; Partanen JV
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():50-67. PubMed ID: 27015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handling of impact forces in inverse dynamics.
    Bisseling RW; Hof AL
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(13):2438-44. PubMed ID: 16209869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choosing Optimal Cutoff Frequencies for Filtering Linear Acceleration and Angular Velocity Signals Associated with Head Impacts Measured by Instrumented Mouthguards.
    Gellner R; Begonia M; Rowson S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 May; 52(5):1415-1424. PubMed ID: 38403749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive usage of the Butterworth digital filter.
    Erer KS
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(13):2934-43. PubMed ID: 17442321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness analysis for determining optimal cut-off of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for population-based colorectal cancer screening (KCIS 16).
    Chen LS; Liao CS; Chang SH; Lai HC; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 18078564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classifying household and locomotive activities using a triaxial accelerometer.
    Oshima Y; Kawaguchi K; Tanaka S; Ohkawara K; Hikihara Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tabata I
    Gait Posture; 2010 Mar; 31(3):370-4. PubMed ID: 20138524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.