These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21903425)

  • 21. Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review.
    Cao P; De Rango P; Zannetti S
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Mar; 23(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 11914004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. No Evidence for Long Term Blood Pressure Differences Between Eversion and Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Two Independent Study Cohorts.
    Nolde JM; Cheng SF; Richards T; Schlaich MP
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 63(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 34742610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Primary versus patching versus eversion as carotid endarterectomy closure.
    Aburahma AF
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2023 Apr; 64(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 36745480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reduced Facial Swelling and Incision Numbness After Q-Modified Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Severe Carotid Stenosis.
    Jiang Q; Zou S; Wu J; Bai J; Jin J; Qu L
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1063-e1068. PubMed ID: 30878744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study.
    Wu S; Wang H; Guo J; Zhang F; Pan D; Ning Y; Gu Y; Guo L
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jun; 19(1):338. PubMed ID: 38902703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of carotid endarterectomy using primary closure, patch closure, and eversion techniques.
    Economopoulos KJ; Gentile AT; Berman SS
    Am J Surg; 1999 Dec; 178(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 10670862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative results of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy.
    Lee JH; Suh BY
    Ann Surg Treat Res; 2014 Oct; 87(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 25317414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-Term Effect of the Type of Carotid Endarterectomy on Blood Pressure.
    Hosn MA; Adams B; Pederson M; Kresowik T; Pascarella L
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Feb; 39():204-208. PubMed ID: 27554699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Protamine Reduces Bleeding Complications without Increasing the Risk of Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-analysis.
    Kakisis JD; Antonopoulos CN; Moulakakis KG; Schneider F; Geroulakos G; Ricco JB
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 52(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 27389942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Absorbable suture material in carotid surgery.
    Gasbarro V; Traina L; Mascoli F; Coscia V; Buffone G; Grande R; Fugetto F; Butrico L; de Franciscis S; Serra R
    Vasa; 2015 Nov; 44(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 26515222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Postoperative blood pressure alterations after carotid endarterectomy : Implications of different reconstruction methods].
    Celi de la Torre JA; Skrypnik DA; Vinogradov RA; Böckler D; Demirel S
    Chirurg; 2018 Feb; 89(2):123-130. PubMed ID: 28842735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does the eversion technique have a lower early postoperative stroke rate than the conventional technique in carotid endarterectomy?
    Abdel Rahim A; Elsamani K; Galal AM; Hammoda MI; Mittapalli D
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2022 Sep; 81():104505. PubMed ID: 36147067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Carotid Body Baroreceptor Preservation and Control of Arterial Pressure in Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy.
    Kotsis T; Christoforou P; Nastos K
    Int J Angiol; 2020 Mar; 29(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 32132814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Commentary on "An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies".
    Ricco JB; Chakfe N
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 55(4):474. PubMed ID: 29409700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methods to convert continuous outcomes into odds ratios of treatment response and numbers needed to treat: meta-epidemiological study.
    da Costa BR; Rutjes AW; Johnston BC; Reichenbach S; Nüesch E; Tonia T; Gemperli A; Guyatt GH; Jüni P
    Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1445-59. PubMed ID: 23045205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The number needed to treat in pairwise and network meta-analysis and its graphical representation.
    Veroniki AA; Bender R; Glasziou P; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():11-22. PubMed ID: 30905696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Number needed to treat (NNT), an index for clinical therapeutic efficacy assessment--its significance and application].
    Cao HJ; Liu JP
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 30(7):752-6. PubMed ID: 20929138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two under-recognized limitations of number needed to treat.
    Wald NJ; Morris JK
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 49(2):359-360. PubMed ID: 31965151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. P056 Power Calculations in Randomised Controlled Trials of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
    Svetlana L; Morris G; Vasiliki S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2020 Dec; 115(Suppl 1):S15. PubMed ID: 33566530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.
    Antonopoulos CN; Kakisis JD; Sergentanis TN; Liapis CD
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Dec; 42(6):751-65. PubMed ID: 21903425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.