These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21903524)

  • 1. Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries.
    Tracy KD; Dykstra BA; Gakenheimer DC; Scheetz JP; Lacina S; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 21903524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: an in-vitro study.
    Behere RR; Lele SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):362. PubMed ID: 21891917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography.
    Gakenheimer DC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jul; 133(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 12148682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
    Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Kold LM; Kold S
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Jun; 110(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12120704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
    Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Huumonen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Sipola A; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150129. PubMed ID: 26234536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis?
    Shrout MK; Russell CM; Potter BJ; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Apr; 127(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 8655867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
    Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of the Spectra early caries detection system.
    Graye M; Markowitz K; Strickland M; Guzy G; Burke M; Houpt M
    J Clin Dent; 2012; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22435317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentists' stated restorative treatment thresholds and their restorative and caries depth decisions.
    Lewis DW; Kay EJ; Main PA; Pharoah MG; Csima A
    J Public Health Dent; 1996; 56(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 8906700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
    Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
    Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic evaluation of occlusal caries: effect of training and experience.
    Lazarchik DA; Firestone AR; Heaven TJ; Filler SJ; Lussi A
    Caries Res; 1995; 29(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 8521436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.