1007 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21903743)
1. Differential expression in RNA-seq: a matter of depth.
Tarazona S; García-Alcalde F; Dopazo J; Ferrer A; Conesa A
Genome Res; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2213-23. PubMed ID: 21903743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data by incorporating non-exonic mapped reads.
Chen HI; Liu Y; Zou Y; Lai Z; Sarkar D; Huang Y; Chen Y
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S14. PubMed ID: 26099631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating gene expression in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mouse striatum using RNA-Seq and microarrays.
Bottomly D; Walter NA; Hunter JE; Darakjian P; Kawane S; Buck KJ; Searles RP; Mooney M; McWeeney SK; Hitzemann R
PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17820. PubMed ID: 21455293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A systematic comparison and evaluation of high density exon arrays and RNA-seq technology used to unravel the peripheral blood transcriptome of sickle cell disease.
Raghavachari N; Barb J; Yang Y; Liu P; Woodhouse K; Levy D; O'Donnell CJ; Munson PJ; Kato GJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2012 Jun; 5():28. PubMed ID: 22747986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DAFS: a data-adaptive flag method for RNA-sequencing data to differentiate genes with low and high expression.
George NI; Chang CW
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 15():92. PubMed ID: 24685233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of RNA-seq and exon arrays for whole genome transcription profiling of the L5 spinal nerve transection model of neuropathic pain in the rat.
Perkins JR; Antunes-Martins A; Calvo M; Grist J; Rust W; Schmid R; Hildebrandt T; Kohl M; Orengo C; McMahon SB; Bennett DL
Mol Pain; 2014 Jan; 10():7. PubMed ID: 24472155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequencing transcriptomes in toto.
Kassahn KS; Waddell N; Grimmond SM
Integr Biol (Camb); 2011 May; 3(5):522-8. PubMed ID: 21298135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Next-generation sequencing facilitates quantitative analysis of wild-type and Nrl(-/-) retinal transcriptomes.
Brooks MJ; Rajasimha HK; Roger JE; Swaroop A
Mol Vis; 2011; 17():3034-54. PubMed ID: 22162623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting differentially expressed genes by smoothing effect of gene length on variance estimation.
Tang J; Wang F
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 13(6):1542004. PubMed ID: 26608751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. RNA-Seq vs dual- and single-channel microarray data: sensitivity analysis for differential expression and clustering.
Sîrbu A; Kerr G; Crane M; Ruskin HJ
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50986. PubMed ID: 23251411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parallel comparison of Illumina RNA-Seq and Affymetrix microarray platforms on transcriptomic profiles generated from 5-aza-deoxy-cytidine treated HT-29 colon cancer cells and simulated datasets.
Xu X; Zhang Y; Williams J; Antoniou E; McCombie WR; Wu S; Zhu W; Davidson NO; Denoya P; Li E
BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S1. PubMed ID: 23902433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LFCseq: a nonparametric approach for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
Lin B; Zhang LF; Chen X
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S7. PubMed ID: 25560842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of microarrays and RNA-seq for gene expression analyses of dose-response experiments.
Black MB; Parks BB; Pluta L; Chu TM; Allen BC; Wolfinger RD; Thomas RS
Toxicol Sci; 2014 Feb; 137(2):385-403. PubMed ID: 24194394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison and calibration of transcriptome data from RNA-Seq and tiling arrays.
Agarwal A; Koppstein D; Rozowsky J; Sboner A; Habegger L; Hillier LW; Sasidharan R; Reinke V; Waterston RH; Gerstein M
BMC Genomics; 2010 Jun; 11():383. PubMed ID: 20565764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GFOLD: a generalized fold change for ranking differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data.
Feng J; Meyer CA; Wang Q; Liu JS; Shirley Liu X; Zhang Y
Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 28(21):2782-8. PubMed ID: 22923299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing next-generation sequencing and microarray technologies in a toxicological study of the effects of aristolochic acid on rat kidneys.
Su Z; Li Z; Chen T; Li QZ; Fang H; Ding D; Ge W; Ning B; Hong H; Perkins RG; Tong W; Shi L
Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1486-93. PubMed ID: 21834575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing differential expression in two-color microarrays: a resampling-based empirical Bayes approach.
Li D; Le Pape MA; Parikh NI; Chen WX; Dye TD
PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e80099. PubMed ID: 24312198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise sampling method: an ANOVA approach allowing robust selection of differentially regulated genes measured by DNA microarrays.
Draghici S; Kulaeva O; Hoff B; Petrov A; Shams S; Tainsky MA
Bioinformatics; 2003 Jul; 19(11):1348-59. PubMed ID: 12874046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probe Region Expression Estimation for RNA-Seq Data for Improved Microarray Comparability.
Uziela K; Honkela A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126545. PubMed ID: 25966034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Length bias correction for RNA-seq data in gene set analyses.
Gao L; Fang Z; Zhang K; Zhi D; Cui X
Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 27(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 21252076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
