These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21904023)

  • 1. Non-invasive measurement of local pulse pressure by pulse wave-based ultrasound manometry (PWUM).
    Vappou J; Luo J; Okajima K; Di Tullio M; Konofagou EE
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Oct; 32(10):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21904023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noninvasive Evaluation of Varying Pulse Pressures
    Li RX; Ip A; Sanz-Miralles E; Konofagou EE
    Artery Res; 2017 Jun; 18():22-28. PubMed ID: 28989555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of central pulse pressure estimated from pulse wave propagation velocity and carotid pulse pressure measured by applantation tonometry].
    Chemaly E; London G; Benetos A; Darné B; Asmar R
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2002; 95(7-8):637-40. PubMed ID: 12365071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noninvasive measurement of central vascular pressures with arterial tonometry: clinical revival of the pulse pressure waveform?
    Nelson MR; Stepanek J; Cevette M; Covalciuc M; Hurst RT; Tajik AJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2010 May; 85(5):460-72. PubMed ID: 20435839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel non-invasive blood pressure waveform measuring system compared to Millar applanation tonometry.
    Földi S; Horváth T; Zieger F; Sótonyi P; Cserey G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Aug; 32(4):717-727. PubMed ID: 28980101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Photoplethysmography for Assessment of Arterial Stiffness: Repeatability and Comparison with Applanation Tonometry.
    von Wowern E; Östling G; Nilsson PM; Olofsson P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135659. PubMed ID: 26291079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pressure wave shape comparison between two non-invasive tonometric devices].
    Agnoletti D; Millasseau S; Topouchian J; Zhang Y; Safar ME; Blacher J
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2013 Jun; 62(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23721987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brachial artery tonometry and the Popeye phenomenon: explanation of anomalies in generating central from upper limb pressure waveforms.
    Adji A; O'Rourke MF
    J Hypertens; 2012 Aug; 30(8):1540-51. PubMed ID: 22635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of carotid atherosclerotic plaques on pulse wave assessment with arterial tonometry.
    Grillo A; Simon G; Salvi P; Rovina M; Baldi C; Prearo I; Bernardi S; Fabris B; Faini A; Parati G; Bardelli M; Carretta R
    J Hypertens; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1609-1617. PubMed ID: 28350575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arterial compliance probe for cuffless evaluation of carotid pulse pressure.
    Joseph J; P M N; Shah MI; Sivaprakasam M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202480. PubMed ID: 30114216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulse pressure amplification, pressure waveform calibration and clinical applications.
    Agnoletti D; Zhang Y; Salvi P; Borghi C; Topouchian J; Safar ME; Blacher J
    Atherosclerosis; 2012 Sep; 224(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 22832004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applanation tonometry: a reliable technique to assess aortic pulse wave velocity in spinal cord injury.
    Currie KD; Hubli M; Krassioukov AV
    Spinal Cord; 2014 Apr; 52(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 24445978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking.
    Van Bortel LM; Balkestein EJ; van der Heijden-Spek JJ; Vanmolkot FH; Staessen JA; Kragten JA; Vredeveld JW; Safar ME; Struijker Boudier HA; Hoeks AP
    J Hypertens; 2001 Jun; 19(6):1037-44. PubMed ID: 11403351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses.
    Davies JI; Struthers AD
    J Hypertens; 2003 Mar; 21(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 12640232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-Invasive Evaluation of a Carotid Arterial Pressure Waveform Using Motion-Tolerant Ultrasound Measurements During the Valsalva Maneuver.
    Seo J; Lee HS; Sodini CG
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Jan; 25(1):163-174. PubMed ID: 32750903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of pulse wave velocity using pulse wave Doppler ultrasound: comparison with arterial tonometry.
    Jiang B; Liu B; McNeill KL; Chowienczyk PJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 34(3):509-12. PubMed ID: 18031922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carotid Artery Applanation Tonometry Does Not Cause Significant Baroreceptor Activation.
    Spronck B; Delhaas T; Op 't Roodt J; Reesink KD
    Am J Hypertens; 2016 Mar; 29(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 25968122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Different Pulse Waveforms for Local Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement in Healthy and Hypertensive Common Carotid Arteries in Vivo.
    Huang C; Su Y; Zhang H; Qian LX; Luo J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1111-23. PubMed ID: 26924694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.
    Dogui A; Kachenoura N; Frouin F; Lefort M; De Cesare A; Mousseaux E; Herment A
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Jan; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 21272312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pulse wave analysis: from the basic sciences to clinical applications].
    Wojciechowska W; Cwynar M; Gryglewska B; Kawecka-Jaszcz K
    Przegl Lek; 2002; 59 Suppl 3():9-14. PubMed ID: 12652990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.