BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21904246)

  • 1. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An elliptical trainer may render the Wingate all-out test more anaerobic.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Delextrat A
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):643-50. PubMed ID: 23924890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle ergometer: performance and energy cost of the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Micklewright D; Alkhatib A; Beneke R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Apr; 96(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 16468058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of an Anaerobic Sprint Running Test Using a Nonmotorized Treadmill.
    McLain TA; Wright GA; Camic CL; Kovacs AJ; Hegge JM; Brice GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Aug; 29(8):2197-204. PubMed ID: 25627645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wingate Anaerobic Test Reliability on the Velotron With Ice Hockey Players.
    Bringhurst RF; Wagner DR; Schwartz S
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jun; 34(6):1716-1722. PubMed ID: 29385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study Between the Wingate and Force-Velocity Anaerobic Cycling Tests: Effect of Physical Fitness.
    Jaafar H; Rouis M; Attiogbé E; Vandewalle H; Driss T
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Jan; 11(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 25849068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarization Effects of an Elliptical All-out Test and the Wingate Test Based on Mechanical Power Indices.
    Ozkaya O
    J Sports Sci Med; 2013; 12(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 24149160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of asynchronous and synchronous arm cranking during the Wingate test.
    Lovell DI; Mason D; Delphinus E; McLellan C
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2011 Sep; 6(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21911866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of the velotron racermate cycle ergometer to measure anaerobic power.
    Astorino TA; Cottrell T
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 33(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22187386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative analysis of two different methods of anaerobic capacity assessment in sedentary young men.
    Klasnja A; Drapsin M; Lukac D; Drid P; Obadov S; Grujić N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20361697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test.
    Talbot C; Kay TD; Walker N; Price MJ
    Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 24950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aerobic and anaerobic changes with high-intensity interval training in active college-aged men.
    Ziemann E; Grzywacz T; Łuszczyk M; Laskowski R; Olek RA; Gibson AL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1104-12. PubMed ID: 20661160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test-retest reliability, criterion-related validity, and minimal detectable change of score on an abbreviated Wingate test for field sport participants.
    Hachana Y; Attia A; Nassib S; Shephard RJ; Chelly MS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 22516906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kansas squat test: a reliable indicator of short-term anaerobic power.
    Fry AC; Kudrna RA; Falvo MJ; Bloomer RJ; Moore CA; Schilling BK; Weiss LW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):630-5. PubMed ID: 23860285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in energy system contributions to the Wingate anaerobic test in climbers after a high altitude expedition.
    Doria C; Verratti V; Pietrangelo T; Fanò-Illic G; Bisconti AV; Shokohyar S; Rampichini S; Limonta E; Coratella G; Longo S; Cè E; Esposito F
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2020 Jul; 120(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 32494861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Wingate and Bosco anaerobic tests.
    Sands WA; McNeal JR; Ochi MT; Urbanek TL; Jemni M; Stone MH
    J Strength Cond Res; 2004 Nov; 18(4):810-5. PubMed ID: 15574087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priming exercise increases Wingate cycling peak power output.
    Ktenidis CK; Margaritelis NV; Cherouveim ED; Stergiopoulos DC; Malliou VJ; Geladas ND; Nikolaidis MG; Paschalis V
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2021 May; 21(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 32449458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between anaerobic components of the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit and 30-second Wingate test.
    Bertuzzi R; Kiss MA; Damasceno M; Oliveira RS; Lima-Silva AE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Mar; 48(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 25627804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.