220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21905942)
1. Ease of use and preference of a new versus widely available prefilled insulin pen assessed by people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.
Oyer D; Narendran P; Qvist M; Niemeyer M; Nadeau DA
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1259-69. PubMed ID: 21905942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability and preference evaluation of a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism by people with diabetes and healthcare professionals.
Bailey T; Thurman J; Niemeyer M; Schmeisl G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Oct; 27(10):2043-52. PubMed ID: 21916529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Healthcare professional and patient assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus two widely available prefilled insulin pens for ease of use, teaching and learning.
Nadeau DA; Campos C; Niemeyer M; Bailey T
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Jan; 28(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 22114905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability and preference assessment of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe in people with diabetes, physicians and nurses.
Campos C; Lajara R; Deluzio T
Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2012 Sep; 13(13):1837-46. PubMed ID: 22873943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment for ease of use and preference of a new prefilled insulin pen (FlexTouch Degludec U100/U200) versus the SoloSTAR insulin pen by patients with diabetes and healthcare professionals.
Pfützner A; Forst T; Niemeyer M; Bailey T
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2014 Sep; 11(9):1381-9. PubMed ID: 24921223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Healthcare professional and patient perceptions of a new prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe.
Lajara R; Guerrero G; Thurman J
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2012 Oct; 9(10):1181-96. PubMed ID: 22971161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and preference assessment of prefilled insulin pen versus vial and syringe with diabetes patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.
Pfützner A; Bailey T; Campos C; Kahn D; Ambers E; Niemeyer M; Guerrero G; Klonoff D; Nayberg I
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 May; 29(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 23402225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens.
Clark PE; Valentine V; Bodie JN; Sarwat S
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jul; 26(7):1745-53. PubMed ID: 20482243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Insulin pen needles: effects of extra-thin wall needle technology on preference, confidence, and other patient ratings.
Aronson R; Gibney MA; Oza K; Bérubé J; Kassler-Taub K; Hirsch L
Clin Ther; 2013 Jul; 35(7):923-933.e4. PubMed ID: 23790553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of dose accuracy and injection force of a novel prefilled insulin pen: comparison with a widely used prefilled insulin pen.
Wielandt JO; Niemeyer M; Hansen MR; Bucher D; Thomsen NB
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2011 Oct; 8(10):1271-6. PubMed ID: 21883036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.
Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G
Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism and a lower injection force than other prefilled insulin pens.
Hemmingsen H; Niemeyer M; Hansen MR; Bucher D; Thomsen NB
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1207-11. PubMed ID: 21864019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient device assessment evaluation of two insulin injection devices in a mixed cohort of insulin-treated patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Schipper C; Musholt P; Niemeyer M; Qvist M; Löffler A; Forst T; Pfützner A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Aug; 28(8):1297-303. PubMed ID: 22746353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intuitiveness, instruction time, and patient acceptance of a prefilled insulin delivery device and a reusable insulin delivery device in a randomized, open-label, crossover handling study in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Reimer T; Hohberg C; Pfützner AH; Jørgensen C; Jensen KH; Pfützner A
Clin Ther; 2008 Dec; 30(12):2252-62. PubMed ID: 19167585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FlexTouch® for the delivery of insulin: technical attributes and perception among patients and healthcare professionals.
Bailey T; Campos C
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2012 May; 9(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 22471783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient acceptance and reliability of new Humulin/Humalog 3.0 ml prefilled insulin pen in ten Croatian diabetes centres.
Sucic M; Galic E; Cabrijan T; Ivandic A; Petrusic A; Wyatt J; Mincheva N; Milicevic Z; Malone J
Med Sci Monit; 2002 Mar; 8(3):PI21-6. PubMed ID: 11884952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health economics and compliance of vials/syringes versus pen devices: a review of the evidence.
Asche CV; Shane-McWhorter L; Raparla S
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Jun; 12 Suppl 1():S101-8. PubMed ID: 20515297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Humalog(®) KwikPen™: an insulin-injecting pen designed for ease of use.
Schwartz SL; Ignaut DA; Bodie JN
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Nov; 7(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 21050084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, cross-over comparison of preference between two reusable insulin pen devices in pen-naïve adults with diabetes.
Wong M; Abdulnabi R; Carey MA; Fu H
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 May; 29(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 23438454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.
Summers KH; Szeinbach SL; Lenox SM
Clin Ther; 2004 Sep; 26(9):1498-505. PubMed ID: 15531012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
