These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21907229)

  • 1. Evaluating methods to measure time-to-contact.
    Lugtigheid AJ; Welchman AE
    Vision Res; 2011 Oct; 51(20):2234-41. PubMed ID: 21907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects.
    Hosking SG; Crassini B
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different motion cues are used to estimate time-to-arrival for frontoparallel and looming trajectories.
    Calabro FJ; Beardsley SA; Vaina LM
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2378-85. PubMed ID: 22056519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How we perceive the trajectory of an approaching object.
    Duke PA; Rushton SK
    J Vis; 2012 Mar; 12(3):9. PubMed ID: 22408040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited.
    Yan JJ; Lorv B; Li H; Sun HJ
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential contribution of velocity and distance to time estimation during self-initiated time-to-collision judgment.
    Li Y; Mo L; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 73():35-47. PubMed ID: 25934633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic modulation of time-to-collision judgments.
    Vagnoni E; Lingard L; Munro S; Longo MR
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Oct; 147():107588. PubMed ID: 32860828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are discrimination thresholds a valid measure of variance for judgments of slant from texture?
    Todd JT; Christensen JC; Guckes KM
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):20.1-18. PubMed ID: 20462321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: toward a method.
    DeLucia PR; Novak JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 9270365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics.
    Domini F; Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 19963200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H; Landwehr K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):581-96. PubMed ID: 21264724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of symbolic meaning of speed on time to contact.
    Battaglini L; Mioni G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102921. PubMed ID: 31445425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.
    Baurès R; Maquestiaux F; DeLucia PR; Defer A; Prigent E
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1971-1984. PubMed ID: 29713757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Localizing the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect.
    Müsseler J; Stork S; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 18207214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion.
    Bennett SJ; Baures R; Hecht H; Benguigui N
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 206(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 20862463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observers cannot accurately estimate the speed of an approaching object in flight.
    Rushton SK; Duke PA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(15):1919-28. PubMed ID: 19146869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth.
    Jacobs RA; Fine I
    Vision Res; 1999 Dec; 39(24):4062-75. PubMed ID: 10748939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extra-retinal signals support the estimation of 3D motion.
    Welchman AE; Harris JM; Brenner E
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 19264090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Stroboscopic Training Improve Judgments of Time-to-Collision?
    Braly AM; DeLucia PR
    Hum Factors; 2020 Feb; 62(1):152-165. PubMed ID: 31009245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motion parallax thresholds for unambiguous depth perception.
    Holmin J; Nawrot M
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):40-7. PubMed ID: 26232612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.