These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21907967)
1. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer. Shammas HJ; Hoffer KJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 153(1):55-61.e2. PubMed ID: 21907967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device. Shammas HJ; Chan S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1474-8. PubMed ID: 20692557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer. Bjeloš Rončević M; Bušić M; Cima I; Kuzmanović Elabjer B; Bosnar D; Miletić D Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 249(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 20981435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Montés-Micó R; Carones F; Buttacchio A; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D J Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 27(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 21323302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometry. Liampa Z; Kynigopoulos M; Pallas G; Gerding H Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2010 Apr; 227(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 20408075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with optical low-coherence reflectometry and rotating dual Scheimpflug analysis. Huerva V; Ascaso FJ; Soldevila J; Lavilla L J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1170-6. PubMed ID: 24852197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Holzer MP; Mamusa M; Auffarth GU Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 93(6):807-10. PubMed ID: 19289385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth measurements using the manual keratometer, Lenstar LS 900 and the Pentacam. Uçakhan OÖ; Akbel V; Bıyıklı Z; Kanpolat A Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 24014981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes. Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18165089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]