These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21907967)
21. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens. Garza-Leon M; Fuentes-de la Fuente HA; García-Treviño AV Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 27770390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes. Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry. Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):644-8. PubMed ID: 20362858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5. Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of soft contact lenses on optical measurements of axial length and keratometry for biometry in eyes with corneal irregularities. Lewis JR; Knellinger AE; Mahmoud AM; Mauger TF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3371-8. PubMed ID: 18441314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of ocular biometry and intraocular lens power using a new biometer and a standard biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Koodkaew S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 24656166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation. Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound for anterior segment biometry. Lara F; Fernández-Sánchez V; López-Gil N; Cerviño A; Montés-Micó R J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):324-9. PubMed ID: 19185250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of corneal power, corneal astigmatism, and axis location in normal eyes obtained from an autokeratometer and a corneal topographer. Kobashi H; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Ishii R; Sato N; Wang G; Shimizu K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):648-54. PubMed ID: 22342010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlation between central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and corneal keratometry as measured by Oculyzer II and WaveLight OB820 in preoperative cataract surgery patients. Kanellopoulos AJ; Asimellis G J Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 28(12):895-900. PubMed ID: 23092131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Univariate and bivariate polar value analysis of corneal astigmatism measurements obtained with 6 instruments. Lee H; Chung JL; Kim EK; Sgrignoli B; Kim TI J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1608-15. PubMed ID: 22795977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with optical low-coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry and reproducibility of both devices. Koktekir BE; Gedik S; Bakbak B Cornea; 2012 Nov; 31(11):1278-81. PubMed ID: 22262222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle-to-angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: evaluation of equivalence. Piñero DP; Plaza Puche AB; Alió JL J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 18165092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproducibility of ocular biometry with a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer in children. Şahin A; Gürsoy H; Başmak H; Yildirim N; Usalp Z; Çolak E Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20853265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biometric measurements in highly myopic eyes. Shen P; Zheng Y; Ding X; Liu B; Congdon N; Morgan I; He M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 23228592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]