These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21908713)

  • 1. Manipulating the content of dynamic natural scenes to characterize response in human MT/MST.
    Durant S; Wall MB; Zanker JM
    J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21908713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in the local motion statistics of real-life optic flow scenes.
    Durant S; Zanker JM
    Neural Comput; 2012 Jul; 24(7):1781-805. PubMed ID: 22428592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retinotopic encoding of the direction aftereffect.
    Wenderoth P; Wiese M
    Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(19):1949-54. PubMed ID: 18621074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent modulation of motion and vection aftereffects revealed by using coherent oscillation and random jitter in optic flow.
    Seno T; Palmisano S; Ito H
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2499-508. PubMed ID: 22040596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optic flow induces nonvisual self-motion aftereffects.
    Cuturi LF; MacNeilage PR
    Curr Biol; 2014 Dec; 24(23):2817-21. PubMed ID: 25454589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model of encoding and decoding in V1 and MT accounts for motion perception anisotropies in the human visual system.
    Rokem A; Silver MA
    Brain Res; 2009 Nov; 1299():3-16. PubMed ID: 19595992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain.
    Bartels A; Zeki S; Logothetis NK
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Mar; 18(3):705-17. PubMed ID: 17615246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implied motion activation in cortical area MT can be explained by visual low-level features.
    Lorteije JA; Barraclough NE; Jellema T; Raemaekers M; Duijnhouwer J; Xiao D; Oram MW; Lankheet MJ; Perrett DI; van Wezel RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 23(6):1533-48. PubMed ID: 20617893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repetitive TMS over V5/MT shortens the duration of spatially localized motion aftereffect: the effects of pulse intensity and stimulation hemisphere.
    Murd C; Einberg A; Bachmann T
    Vision Res; 2012 Sep; 68():59-64. PubMed ID: 22842401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential processing of the direction and focus of expansion of optic flow stimuli in areas MST and V3A of the human visual cortex.
    Strong SL; Silson EH; Gouws AD; Morland AB; McKeefry DJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jun; 117(6):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 28298300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The parallel between reverse-phi and motion aftereffects.
    Bours RJ; Kroes MC; Lankheet MJ
    J Vis; 2007 Aug; 7(11):8.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.
    Kanai R; Verstraten FA
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3109-16. PubMed ID: 16023173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion perception without explicit activity in areas MT and MST.
    Ilg UJ; Churan J
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 92(3):1512-23. PubMed ID: 15084645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential dependency on motion coherence in subregions of the human MT+ complex.
    Becker HG; Erb M; Haarmeier T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 28(8):1674-85. PubMed ID: 18973585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion aftereffect duration is not changed by perceptual learning: evidence against the representation modification hypothesis.
    Petrov AA; Van Horn NM
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 61():4-14. PubMed ID: 21856327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST.
    Smith AT; Wall MB; Williams AL; Singh KD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 23(2):561-9. PubMed ID: 16420463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.
    Rezec A; Krekelberg B; Dobkins KR
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3035-44. PubMed ID: 15474576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gamma oscillations underlying the visual motion aftereffect.
    Tikhonov A; Händel B; Haarmeier T; Lutzenberger W; Thier P
    Neuroimage; 2007 Dec; 38(4):708-19. PubMed ID: 17900931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.
    Boynton GM; Ciaramitaro VM; Arman AC
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Test stimulus characteristics determine the perceived speed of the dynamic motion aftereffect.
    Curran W; Benton CP
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3284-90. PubMed ID: 16684553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.