386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21908903)
1. Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.
Okamoto RJ; Clayton EH; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6379-400. PubMed ID: 21908903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous magnetic resonance and optical elastography acquisitions: Comparison of displacement images and shear modulus estimations using a single vibration source.
Brinker ST; Kearney SP; Royston TJ; Klatt D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Aug; 84():135-144. PubMed ID: 29775815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.
Arunachalam SP; Rossman PJ; Arani A; Lake DS; Glaser KJ; Trzasko JD; Manduca A; McGee KP; Ehman RL; Araoz PA
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1184-1192. PubMed ID: 27016276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Viscoelastic properties of human cerebellum using magnetic resonance elastography.
Zhang J; Green MA; Sinkus R; Bilston LE
J Biomech; 2011 Jul; 44(10):1909-13. PubMed ID: 21565346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical analysis of an axially symmetric cylindrical phantom with a spherical heterogeneity for MR elastography.
Schwartz BL; Yin Z; Magin RL
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(18):6821-6832. PubMed ID: 27579850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wide-range dynamic magnetic resonance elastography.
Riek K; Klatt D; Nuzha H; Mueller S; Neumann U; Sack I; Braun J
J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1380-6. PubMed ID: 21295305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harmonic wideband simultaneous dual-frequency MR Elastography.
Sango Solanas P; Tse Ve Koon K; Ratiney H; Millioz F; Caussy C; Beuf O
NMR Biomed; 2021 Feb; 34(2):e4442. PubMed ID: 33179393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of viscoelastic property characterization of plastisol phantoms with magnetic resonance elastography and high-frequency rheometry.
Lefebvre PM; Koon KT; Brusseau E; Nicolle S; Palieme JF; Lambert SA; Grenier D
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1216-1219. PubMed ID: 28268544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography.
Feng Y; Qiu S; Chen Y; Wang R; He Z; Kong L; Chen Y; Ma S
J Vis Exp; 2022 May; (183):. PubMed ID: 35635467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency-dependent viscoelastic parameters of mouse brain tissue estimated by MR elastography.
Clayton EH; Garbow JR; Bayly PV
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2391-406. PubMed ID: 21427486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative viscoelastic parameters measured by harmonic motion imaging.
Vappou J; Maleke C; Konofagou EE
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3579-94. PubMed ID: 19454785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dispersion in Tissue-Mimicking Gels Measured with Shear Wave Elastography and Torsional Vibration Rheometry.
Yengul SS; Barbone PE; Madore B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):586-604. PubMed ID: 30473175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of oil-in-gelatin phantoms for viscoelasticity measurement in ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Nguyen MM; Zhou S; Robert JL; Shamdasani V; Xie H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 24139915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Viscoelasticity of children and adolescent brains through MR elastography.
Ozkaya E; Fabris G; Macruz F; Suar ZM; Abderezaei J; Su B; Laksari K; Wu L; Camarillo DB; Pauly KB; Wintermark M; Kurt M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104229. PubMed ID: 33387852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of viscosity estimation for oil-in-gelatin phantom in shear wave based ultrasound elastography.
Zhu Y; Dong C; Yin Y; Chen X; Guo Y; Zheng Y; Shen Y; Wang T; Zhang X; Chen S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 25542484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement.
Vappou J; Breton E; Choquet P; Goetz C; Willinger R; Constantinesco A
MAGMA; 2007 Dec; 20(5-6):273-8. PubMed ID: 18080819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Supersonic transient magnetic resonance elastography for quantitative assessment of tissue elasticity.
Liu Y; Liu J; Fite BZ; Foiret J; Ilovitsh A; Leach JK; Dumont E; Caskey CF; Ferrara KW
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4083-4106. PubMed ID: 28426437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of five viscoelastic models for estimating viscoelastic parameters using ultrasound shear wave elastography.
Zhou B; Zhang X
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Sep; 85():109-116. PubMed ID: 29879581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tabletop magnetic resonance elastography for the measurement of viscoelastic parameters of small tissue samples.
Ipek-Ugay S; Drießle T; Ledwig M; Guo J; Hirsch S; Sack I; Braun J
J Magn Reson; 2015 Feb; 251():13-8. PubMed ID: 25554945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound viscoelasticity assessment using an adaptive torsional shear wave propagation method.
Ouared A; Kazemirad S; Montagnon E; Cloutier G
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1603. PubMed ID: 27036560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
