BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21909079)

  • 1. Identifying additional lymph nodes in radical cystectomy lymphadenectomy specimens.
    Gordetsky J; Scosyrev E; Rashid H; Wu G; Silvers C; Golijanin D; Messing EM; Yao JL
    Mod Pathol; 2012 Jan; 25(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 21909079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
    Steven K; Poulsen AL
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Mills RD; Turner WH; Fleischmann A; Markwalder R; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11435814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens.
    Bochner BH; Herr HW; Reuter VE
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2295-6. PubMed ID: 11696756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the true number of lymph nodes in lymphadenectomy specimens from radical cystectomy.
    Jensen JB; Ulhøi BP; Jensen KM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 19437191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complete Tissue Submission to Increase Lymph Node Detection in Pelvic Lymph Node Packets Submitted for Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Radical Cystectomy.
    Rais-Bahrami S; Tracht JP; McIntosh ER; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Feb; 25(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 27388198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
    Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
    Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The anatomic extent and completeness of pelvic lymphadenectomy is what matters.
    Pohar KS
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 23851384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
    Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a minimum lymph node policy in radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy on lymph node yields, lymph node positivity rates, lymph node density, and survivorship in patients with bladder cancer.
    Fang AC; Ahmad AE; Whitson JM; Ferrell LD; Carroll PR; Konety BR
    Cancer; 2010 Apr; 116(8):1901-8. PubMed ID: 20186823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lymph node yield in node-negative patients predicts cancer specific survival following radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma.
    Crozier J; Papa N; Perera M; Stewart M; Goad J; Sengupta S; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
    Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):416-422. PubMed ID: 29124240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role and extent of lymphadenectomy during radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer.
    Svatek R; Zehnder P
    Curr Urol Rep; 2012 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 22328190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Significance of pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prognosis after radical cystectomy].
    Leissner J; Allhoff EP; Hohenfellner R; Wolf HK
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Apr; 127(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12085284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
    Stein JP
    Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 2002 TNM nodal status with lymph node density in node-positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis by the number of lymph nodes removed.
    Jeong IG; Park J; Song K; Ro JY; Song C; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 19556153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incidence of occult lymph-node metastasis missed by standard pathological examination in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.
    Jensen JB; Høyer S; Jensen KM
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Dec; 45(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 21767245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.
    Stein JP; Cai J; Groshen S; Skinner DG
    J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12796639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
    Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Occult pelvic lymph node involvement in bladder cancer: implications for definitive radiation.
    Goldsmith B; Baumann BC; He J; Tucker K; Bekelman J; Deville C; Vapiwala N; Vaughn D; Keefe SM; Guzzo T; Malkowicz SB; Christodouleas JP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):603-10. PubMed ID: 24411628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymph node density vs. the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM nodal staging system in node-positive bladder cancer in patients undergoing extended or super-extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
    Lee D; Yoo S; You D; Hong B; Cho YM; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H; Ro JY; Jeong IG
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):151.e1-151.e7. PubMed ID: 28139370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.