152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21909079)
1. Identifying additional lymph nodes in radical cystectomy lymphadenectomy specimens.
Gordetsky J; Scosyrev E; Rashid H; Wu G; Silvers C; Golijanin D; Messing EM; Yao JL
Mod Pathol; 2012 Jan; 25(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 21909079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
Steven K; Poulsen AL
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Mills RD; Turner WH; Fleischmann A; Markwalder R; Thalmann GN; Studer UE
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 11435814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of separate versus en bloc pelvic lymph node dissection on the number of lymph nodes retrieved in cystectomy specimens.
Bochner BH; Herr HW; Reuter VE
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2295-6. PubMed ID: 11696756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of the true number of lymph nodes in lymphadenectomy specimens from radical cystectomy.
Jensen JB; Ulhøi BP; Jensen KM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 19437191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complete Tissue Submission to Increase Lymph Node Detection in Pelvic Lymph Node Packets Submitted for Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy and Radical Cystectomy.
Rais-Bahrami S; Tracht JP; McIntosh ER; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Feb; 25(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 27388198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Separate submission of standard lymphadenectomy in 6 packets versus en bloc lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer.
Ather MH; Alam Z; Jamshaid A; Siddiqui KM; Sulaiman MN
Urol J; 2008; 5(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 18592461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The anatomic extent and completeness of pelvic lymphadenectomy is what matters.
Pohar KS
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Sep; 23(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 23851384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy.
Wright JL; Lin DW; Porter MP
Cancer; 2008 Jun; 112(11):2401-8. PubMed ID: 18383515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a minimum lymph node policy in radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy on lymph node yields, lymph node positivity rates, lymph node density, and survivorship in patients with bladder cancer.
Fang AC; Ahmad AE; Whitson JM; Ferrell LD; Carroll PR; Konety BR
Cancer; 2010 Apr; 116(8):1901-8. PubMed ID: 20186823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymph node yield in node-negative patients predicts cancer specific survival following radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma.
Crozier J; Papa N; Perera M; Stewart M; Goad J; Sengupta S; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Nov; 58(6):416-422. PubMed ID: 29124240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role and extent of lymphadenectomy during radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer.
Svatek R; Zehnder P
Curr Urol Rep; 2012 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 22328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Significance of pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prognosis after radical cystectomy].
Leissner J; Allhoff EP; Hohenfellner R; Wolf HK
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Apr; 127(4):315-21. PubMed ID: 12085284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: how high is "high enough"?
Stein JP
Urol Oncol; 2006; 24(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 16818190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 2002 TNM nodal status with lymph node density in node-positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: analysis by the number of lymph nodes removed.
Jeong IG; Park J; Song K; Ro JY; Song C; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 19556153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence of occult lymph-node metastasis missed by standard pathological examination in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.
Jensen JB; Høyer S; Jensen KM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Dec; 45(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 21767245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.
Stein JP; Cai J; Groshen S; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2003 Jul; 170(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12796639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical cystectomy with extended lymphadenectomy: evaluating separate package versus en bloc submission for node positive bladder cancer.
Stein JP; Penson DF; Cai J; Miranda G; Skinner EC; Dunn MA; Groshen S; Lieskovsky G; Skinner DG
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):876-81; discussion 881-2. PubMed ID: 17296365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occult pelvic lymph node involvement in bladder cancer: implications for definitive radiation.
Goldsmith B; Baumann BC; He J; Tucker K; Bekelman J; Deville C; Vapiwala N; Vaughn D; Keefe SM; Guzzo T; Malkowicz SB; Christodouleas JP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):603-10. PubMed ID: 24411628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph node density vs. the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM nodal staging system in node-positive bladder cancer in patients undergoing extended or super-extended pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Lee D; Yoo S; You D; Hong B; Cho YM; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H; Ro JY; Jeong IG
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):151.e1-151.e7. PubMed ID: 28139370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]