These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21909166)

  • 1. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 21451747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
    Boutros N; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 21765545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do reinforcers affect choice? Preference pulses after responses and reinforcers.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 28573713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice.
    Grossbard CL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 3711777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of a local negative feedback function between choice and relative reinforcer rate.
    Davison M; Elliffe D; Marr MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21451748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Being there on time: Reinforcer effects on timing and locating.
    Cowie S; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):340-362. PubMed ID: 31994217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.
    López-Tolsa GE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104511. PubMed ID: 34562512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 3746189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.