287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21909482)
1. A critical appraisal of the survival and complication rates of tooth-supported all-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: the application of evidence-based dentistry.
Layton D
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):417-27. PubMed ID: 21909482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs.
Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Makarov NA; Zwahlen M; Thoma DS
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):624-39. PubMed ID: 25935732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
Walton TR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.
Morton D; Gallucci G; Lin WS; Pjetursson B; Polido W; Roehling S; Sailer I; Aghaloo T; Albera H; Bohner L; Braut V; Buser D; Chen S; Dawson A; Eckert S; Gahlert M; Hamilton A; Jaffin R; Jarry C; Karayazgan B; Laine J; Martin W; Rahman L; Schlegel A; Shiota M; Stilwell C; Vorster C; Zembic A; Zhou W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():215-223. PubMed ID: 30328196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review.
Le M; Papia E; Larsson C
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 42(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 25580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).
Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ten-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic.
Kern M; Sasse M; Wolfart S
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Mar; 143(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22383203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?
Anusavice KJ; Kakar K; Ferree N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():218-31. PubMed ID: 17594384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Anusavice KJ
Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 22192254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pieralli S; Kohal RJ; Rabel K; von Stein-Lausnitz M; Vach K; Spies BC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():224-236. PubMed ID: 30306694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 3-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Schropp L; Isidor F
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 27148986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five year clinical outcomes of metal ceramic and zirconia-based implant-supported dental prostheses: A retrospective study.
Nejatidanesh F; Abbasi M; Savabi G; Bonakdarchian M; Atash R; Savabi O
J Dent; 2020 Sep; 100():103420. PubMed ID: 32598899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.
Pjetursson BE; Thoma D; Jung R; Zwahlen M; Zembic A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():22-38. PubMed ID: 23062125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Pjetursson BE; Zwahlen M; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():86-96. PubMed ID: 17594373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses.
Teichmann M; Göckler F; Weber V; Yildirim M; Wolfart S; Edelhoff D
J Dent; 2017 Jan; 56():65-77. PubMed ID: 27984088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 10-year randomized trial (RCT) of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Balmer M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Känel S; Thoma DS
J Dent; 2018 Sep; 76():32-39. PubMed ID: 29807060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up.
Sailer I; Gottnerb J; Kanelb S; Hammerle CH
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 19918588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
