These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21909490)

  • 21. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience.
    Attard NJ; Zarb GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 12690347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Benic GI; Hogsett VL; White GS; Lal K; Gallucci GO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):676-681. PubMed ID: 21631595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical complications of implant-supported fixed partial dentures in partially edentulous cases after an average observation period of 5 years.
    Kreissl ME; Gerds T; Muche R; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):720-6. PubMed ID: 17888017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses.
    Wyatt CC; Zarb GA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 9581406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implant impression accuracy of parallel and non-parallel implants: a comparative in-vitro analysis of open and closed tray techniques.
    Osman MS; Ziada HM; Abubakr NH; Suliman AM
    Int J Implant Dent; 2019 Feb; 5(1):4. PubMed ID: 30778790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Occlusal rehabilitation in a partially edentulous patient with lost vertical dimension using dental implants: a clinical report.
    Madani AS; Moeintaghavi A; Rezaeei M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E058-64. PubMed ID: 21203738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
    Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Immediate loading of dental implants in partialful edentulous and edentulous jaws].
    Di P; Lin Y; Qiu LX; Li JH; Chen B; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jul; 39(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 15454005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. One-step fixed edentulous implant impressions and maxillomandibular jaw relationships: technical note.
    Dario LJ
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 9151613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient.
    Marchack CB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 17618922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the three-dimensional accuracy of implant impression techniques in two simulated clinical conditions by optical scanning.
    Sabouhi M; Bajoghli F; Abolhasani M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25506645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implants and sinus-inlay graft in a 1-stage procedure in severely atrophied maxillae: prosthodontic aspects in a 3-year follow-up study.
    Smedberg JI; Johansson P; Ekenbäck D; Wannfors D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11669249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Flapless implant placement: a technique to eliminate the need for a removable interim prosthesis.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 18762035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.