These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2190967)

  • 1. Coliforms as a measure of sewage contamination of the River Zambezi.
    Feresu SB; Van Sickle J
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 Apr; 68(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 2190967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
    Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enterococci vs coliforms as a possible fecal contamination indicator: baseline data for Karachi.
    Hussain M; Rasool SA; Khan MT; Wajid A
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2007 Apr; 20(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17416563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacteriological quality of potable water sources supplying Morogoro municipality and its outskirts: a case study in Tanzania.
    Jiwa SF; Mugula JK; Msangi MJ
    Epidemiol Infect; 1991 Dec; 107(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 1752297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of an intense combined sewer overflow event on the microbiological water quality of the Seine River.
    Passerat J; Ouattara NK; Mouchel JM; Rocher V; Servais P
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):893-903. PubMed ID: 20934197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of a new sewage treatment plant on faecal indicator numbers, campylobacters and bathing water compliance in Morecambe Bay.
    Obiri-Danso K; Jones K
    J Appl Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 86(4):603-14. PubMed ID: 10212406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of agricultural run-off on bacterial populations in a river.
    Fernández-Alvarez RM; Carballo-Cuervo S; de la Rosa-Jorge MC; Rodríguez-de Lecea J
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1991 May; 70(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 1874685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of seawater storage on coliforms, faecal coliforms and Escherichia coli.
    Mates A
    Microbios; 1992; 70(282):43-8. PubMed ID: 1501593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relation between Aeromonas and faecal coliforms in fresh waters.
    Araujo RM; Arribas RM; Lucena F; Pares R
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1989 Aug; 67(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 2553653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of sewage discharge on the pollution of an estuary (Morlaix, France).
    Schwartzbrod L; Pommepuy M; Albert M; Dupray E; Boher S; Beril C; Guichaoua C
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 Nov; 192(3):238-47. PubMed ID: 1663751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distribution of sewage pollution around a maritime Antarctic research station indicated by faecal coliforms, Clostridium perfringens and faecal sterol markers.
    Hughes KA; Thompson A
    Environ Pollut; 2004; 127(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 14638291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation between bacterial indicators and bacteriophages in sewage and sludge.
    Mandilara GD; Smeti EM; Mavridou AT; Lambiri MP; Vatopoulos AC; Rigas FP
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Oct; 263(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 16958859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbial source tracking to identify human and ruminant sources of faecal pollution in an ephemeral Florida river.
    Chase E; Hunting J; Staley C; Harwood VJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Dec; 113(6):1396-406. PubMed ID: 22963043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antibiotic resistance of native and faecal bacteria isolated from rivers, reservoirs and sewage treatment facilities in Victoria, south-eastern Australia.
    Boon PI; Cattanach M
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1999 Mar; 28(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 10196762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments.
    Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aspects of health-related microbiology of the Subin, an urban river in Kumasi, Ghana.
    Obiri-Danso K; Weobong CA; Jones K
    J Water Health; 2005 Mar; 3(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 15952454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of culturable fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli enumeration in freshwaters.
    Garcia-Armisen T; Prats J; Servais P
    Can J Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 53(6):798-801. PubMed ID: 17668040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of oxygen on survival of faecal pollution indicators in drinking water.
    Roslev P; Bjergbaek LA; Hesselsoe M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 96(5):938-45. PubMed ID: 15078509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological profile of raw Nile water.
    El-Taweel GE
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 1998; 73(5-6):449-77. PubMed ID: 17217019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal and spatial variability of instream indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli) and implications for water quality monitoring.
    Crosby SC; Spiller NC; Tietz KE; Cooper JR; Fraboni PJ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):745. PubMed ID: 31720860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.