These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21910520)

  • 1. The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 21910520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1155-78. PubMed ID: 20436208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.
    Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):1179-98. PubMed ID: 20436209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.
    Ulrich R; Vorberg D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1219-27. PubMed ID: 19633337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception.
    Recanzone GH
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 89(2):1078-93. PubMed ID: 12574482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision strategies for the two-alternative forced choice reminder paradigm.
    Hautus MJ; Shepherd D; Peng M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):729-37. PubMed ID: 21264694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-dependent processing of temporal order.
    Fink M; Ulbrich P; Churan J; Wittmann M
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):344-52. PubMed ID: 16413700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shape discrimination in age-related macular degeneration.
    Wang YZ; Wilson E; Locke KG; Edwards AO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):2055-62. PubMed ID: 12037018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of stimulus modality and task difficulty on attentional modulation of blink startle.
    Neumann DL; Lipp OV; McHugh MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 15102126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Good vibrations: human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality.
    Jones LA; Poliakoff E; Wells J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2171-86. PubMed ID: 19370453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The boundaries of sequential modulations: evidence for set-level control.
    Hazeltine E; Lightman E; Schwarb H; Schumacher EH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1898-914. PubMed ID: 21767054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2332-52. PubMed ID: 21735314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.