These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21910561)

  • 1. Discriminating famous from fictional names based on lifetime experience: evidence in support of a signal-detection model based on finite mixture distributions.
    Bowles B; Harlow IM; Meeking MM; Köhler S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 21910561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries.
    Pratte MS; Rouder JN; Morey RD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):224-32. PubMed ID: 20053058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity or conceptual priming: event-related potentials in name recognition.
    Stenberg G; Hellman J; Johansson M; Rosén I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):447-60. PubMed ID: 18564050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.
    Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jan; 114(1):152-76. PubMed ID: 17227185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Familiarity for associations? A test of the domain dichotomy theory.
    Harlow IM; Mackenzie G; Donaldson DI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1381-8. PubMed ID: 20804278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanisms underlying the production of false memories for famous people's names in aging and Alzheimer's disease.
    Plancher G; Guyard A; Nicolas S; Piolino P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2527-36. PubMed ID: 19410586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory.
    Neely JH; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1141-72. PubMed ID: 19048453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.
    Rotello CM; Macmillan NA; Reeder JA
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jul; 111(3):588-616. PubMed ID: 15250777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Remember" source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process.
    Slotnick SD
    Memory; 2010 Jan; 18(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 19937493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Source memory for unidentified stimuli.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 20192538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition ROCs are curvilinear-or are they? On premature arguments against the two-high-threshold model of recognition.
    Bröder A; Schütz J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):587-606. PubMed ID: 19379038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics.
    Healy MR; Light LL; Chung C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):768-88. PubMed ID: 16060779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing theories of recognition memory by predicting performance across paradigms.
    Smith DG; Duncan MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 15099130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do changes in the subjective experience of recognition over time suggest independent processes?
    Tunney RJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):43-62. PubMed ID: 19341516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.
    Yonelinas AP; Dobbins I; Szymanski MD; Dhaliwal HS; King L
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):418-41. PubMed ID: 9063609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection.
    Turner BM; Van Zandt T; Brown S
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Oct; 118(4):583-613. PubMed ID: 21895383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing single- and dual-process models of memory development.
    Hayes BK; Dunn JC; Joubert A; Taylor R
    Dev Sci; 2017 Nov; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 27659763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling associative recognition: a comparison of two-high-threshold, two-high-threshold signal detection, and mixture distribution models.
    Macho S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 14736298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.
    Wixted JT; Mickes L
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1025-54. PubMed ID: 20836613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.