These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21911034)
41. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results. Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: a review with surgical and prosthodontic perspectives of a novel approach. Alsabeeha N; Payne AG; De Silva RK; Swain MV Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 19298290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A prospective 2-year clinical evaluation of overdentures attached to nonsplinted implants utilizing ERA attachments. Landa LS; Cho SC; Froum SJ; Elian N; Tarnow DP Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):151-6; quiz 158. PubMed ID: 11315434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A comparison of patient satisfaction between treatment with conventional complete dentures and overdentures in the elderly: a literature review. Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Gomes EA; Tabata LF Gerodontology; 2010 Jun; 27(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 19467020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [A survey of implant-retained superstructure types in the edentulous mandible in The Netherlands]. de Baat C; Cune MS; Carlsson GE Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):363-7. PubMed ID: 16300321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effectiveness of 2-implant overdentures - a pragmatic international multicentre study. Rashid F; Awad MA; Thomason JM; Piovano A; Spielberg GP; Scilingo E; Mojon P; Müller F; Spielberg M; Heydecke G; Stoker G; Wismeijer D; Allen F; Feine JS J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 20704639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Feine JS; Carlsson GE; Awad MA; Chehade A; Duncan WJ; Gizani S; Head T; Heydecke G; Lund JP; MacEntee M; Mericske-Stern R; Mojon P; Morais JA; Naert I; Payne AG; Penrod J; Stoker GT; Tawse-Smith A; Taylor TD; Thomason JM; Thomson WM; Wismeijer D Gerodontology; 2002 Jul; 19(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12164236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture. Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol. Stoker GT; Wismeijer D Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 19681940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. Satisfaction and subjective chewing capabilities]. Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA; Geertman ME Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Dec; 109(12):475-80. PubMed ID: 12572098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Mini-Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis alongside a Randomized Trial. Della Vecchia MP; Leles CR; Cunha TR; Ribeiro AB; Sorgini DB; Muglia VA; Reis AC; Albuquerque RF; de Souza RF JDR Clin Trans Res; 2018 Jan; 3(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 30938654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets. Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses. Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study. ELsyad MA Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study. Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Schmidinger S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 12939013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]