BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21911301)

  • 41. Quadriceps femoris electromyogram during concentric, isometric and eccentric phases of fatiguing dynamic knee extensions.
    Pincivero DM; Gandhi V; Timmons MK; Coelho AJ
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 16321626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characteristics of power spectrum density function of EMG during muscle contraction below 30%MVC.
    Roman-Liu D; Konarska M
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):864-74. PubMed ID: 18590966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of handgrip force using frequency-band technique during fatiguing muscle contraction.
    Soo Y; Sugi M; Yokoi H; Arai T; Nishino M; Kato R; Nakamura T; Ota J
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Oct; 20(5):888-95. PubMed ID: 19837604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Duration of differential activations is functionally related to fatigue prevention during low-level contractions.
    Holtermann A; Grönlund C; Ingebrigtsen J; Karlsson JS; Roeleveld K
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2010 Apr; 20(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 19481957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction of endurance capacity of quadriceps muscles in humans using surface electromyogram spectrum analysis during submaximal voluntary isometric contractions.
    Maïsetti O; Guével A; Legros P; Hogrel JY
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Oct; 87(6):509-19. PubMed ID: 12355190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Simulation analysis of interference EMG during fatiguing voluntary contractions. Part II--changes in amplitude and spectral characteristics.
    Dimitrov GV; Arabadzhiev TI; Hogrel JY; Dimitrova NA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Feb; 18(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 16963280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fatigue analysis of interference EMG signals obtained from biceps brachii during isometric voluntary contraction at various force levels.
    Dimitrova NA; Arabadzhiev TI; Hogrel JY; Dimitrov GV
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Apr; 19(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 17931886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Motor-unit activity differs with load type during a fatiguing contraction.
    Mottram CJ; Jakobi JM; Semmler JG; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 93(3):1381-92. PubMed ID: 15483059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Wavelet analysis of surface electromyography to determine muscle fatigue.
    Kumar DK; Pah ND; Bradley A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Dec; 11(4):400-6. PubMed ID: 14960116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The comparison of wavelet- and Fourier-based electromyographic indices of back muscle fatigue during dynamic contractions: validity and reliability results.
    da Silva RA; Larivière C; Arsenault AB; Nadeau S; Plamondon A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(3-4):147-62. PubMed ID: 18551835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Anticipation mechanism in body sway control and effect of muscle fatigue.
    Mello RG; Oliveira LF; Nadal J
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Dec; 17(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17142060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessment of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from surface EMG signals during fatiguing dynamic contractions.
    Farina D; Pozzo M; Merlo E; Bottin A; Merletti R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Aug; 51(8):1383-93. PubMed ID: 15311823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electromyographical manifestations of muscle fatigue during different levels of simulated light manual assembly work.
    Bosch T; de Looze MP; Kingma I; Visser B; van Dieën JH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug; 19(4):e246-56. PubMed ID: 18586520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Electromyographic instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous mean power frequency patterns across a range of motion during a concentric isokinetic muscle action of the biceps brachii.
    Beck TW; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Cramer JT; Weir JP; Coburn JW; Malek MH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Oct; 16(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 16368246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Strategies to identify changes in SEMG due to muscle fatigue during cycling.
    Singh VP; Kumar DK; Polus B; Fraser S
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 17365438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The assessment of back muscle capacity using intermittent static contractions. Part II: validity and reliability of biomechanical correlates of muscle fatigue.
    Larivière C; Gravel D; Gagnon D; Arsenault AB
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Dec; 18(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17643315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Statistical modelling of fatigue-related electromyographic median frequency characteristics of back and hip muscles during a standardized isometric back extension test.
    Coorevits PL; Danneels LA; Ramon H; Van Audekercke R; Cambier DC; Vanderstraeten GG
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Oct; 15(5):444-51. PubMed ID: 15878288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fatigue-related changes in fascicle-tendon geometry over repeated contractions: difference between synergist muscles.
    Mitsukawa N; Sugisaki N; Kanehisa H; Fukunaga T; Kawakami Y
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Sep; 40(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 19705427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Estimate of M-wave changes in human biceps brachii during continuous stimulation.
    Dimitrova NA; Hogrel JY; Arabadzhiev TI; Dimitrov GV
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 15811604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Static and dynamic myoelectric measures of shoulder muscle fatigue during intermittent dynamic exertions of low to moderate intensity.
    Nussbaum MA
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2001 Aug; 85(3-4):299-309. PubMed ID: 11560084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.