These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21911302)

  • 21. Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production?
    Navarrete E; Basagni B; Alario FX; Costa A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Oct; 59(10):1681-90. PubMed ID: 16945853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
    Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reading and reading-related skills in children using cochlear implants: prospects for the influence of cued speech.
    Bouton S; Bertoncini J; Serniclaes W; Colé P
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(4):458-73. PubMed ID: 21482584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Word decoding and picture naming in children with a reading disability.
    Assink EM; Soeteman WP; Knuijt PP
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1999 Aug; 125(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 10441874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Homophone effects in lexical decision.
    Pexman PM; Lupker SJ; Jared D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):139-56. PubMed ID: 11204094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Recollective performance advantages for implicit memory tasks.
    Sheldon SA; Moscovitch M
    Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):681-97. PubMed ID: 20721805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measurements of auditory-verbal STM span in aphasia: effects of item, task, and lexical impairment.
    Martin N; Ayala J
    Brain Lang; 2004 Jun; 89(3):464-83. PubMed ID: 15120538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition and reading aloud of kana and kanji word: an fMRI study.
    Ino T; Nakai R; Azuma T; Kimura T; Fukuyama H
    Brain Res Bull; 2009 Mar; 78(4-5):232-9. PubMed ID: 19100312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A diffusion model account of normal and impaired readers.
    Ratcliff R; Perea M; Colangelo A; Buchanan L
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 15177817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation.
    Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):1016-29. PubMed ID: 18717737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Asymmetric processing of lexical tonal contrast in Swedish.
    Felder V; Jönsson-Steiner E; Eulitz C; Lahiri A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1890-9. PubMed ID: 19933571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A cohort model of visual word recognition.
    Johnson NF; Pugh KR
    Cogn Psychol; 1994 Jun; 26(3):240-346. PubMed ID: 8033536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):951-61. PubMed ID: 12219801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modality-independent involvement of the left BA 44 during lexical decision making.
    Heim S; Eickhoff SB; Ischebeck AK; Supp G; Amunts K
    Brain Struct Funct; 2007 Jul; 212(1):95-106. PubMed ID: 17717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response execution in lexical decision tasks obscures sex-specific lateralization effects in language processing: evidence from event-related potential measures during word reading.
    Hill H; Ott F; Herbert C; Weisbrod M
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jul; 16(7):978-89. PubMed ID: 16177269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
    Nation K; Cocksey J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.