BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21911866)

  • 1. A comparison of asynchronous and synchronous arm cranking during the Wingate test.
    Lovell DI; Mason D; Delphinus E; McLellan C
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2011 Sep; 6(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21911866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry.
    Smith PM; Chapman ML; Hazlehurst KE; Goss-Sampson MA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 17337211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanically braked elliptical Wingate test: modification considerations, load optimization, and reliability.
    Ozkaya O; Colakoglu M; Kuzucu EO; Yildiztepe E
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 May; 26(5):1313-23. PubMed ID: 21904246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry.
    Mossberg K; Willman C; Topor MA; Crook H; Patak S
    Spinal Cord; 1999 Aug; 37(8):569-74. PubMed ID: 10455533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the optimal load setting for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women.
    Forbes SC; Kennedy MD; Boule NB; Bell G
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 35(10):835-9. PubMed ID: 24920563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry.
    Smith PM; Doherty M; Price MJ
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Apr; 25(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 17454538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of the arm-cranking 30-second Wingate Anaerobic Test (the WAnT) to assess power in amputee football players.
    Nowak AM; Molik B; Kosmol A; Szczepaniak M; Marszałek J
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2021; 23(3):13-23. PubMed ID: 34978315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recovery of upper-body muscle power after short intensive exercise: comparing boys and men.
    Weinstein Y; Inbar O; Mor-Unikovski R; Luder A; Dubnov-Raz G
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2018 Aug; 118(8):1555-1564. PubMed ID: 29761312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does upper body strength and power influence upper body Wingate performance in men and women?
    Lovell D; Mason D; Delphinus E; Eagles A; Shewring S; McLellan C
    Int J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 32(10):771-5. PubMed ID: 21618156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of gravity and kinematic constraints on muscle synergies in arm cycling.
    Botzheim L; Laczko J; Torricelli D; Mravcsik M; Pons JL; Oliveira Barroso F
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1367-1381. PubMed ID: 33534650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kansas squat test: a reliable indicator of short-term anaerobic power.
    Fry AC; Kudrna RA; Falvo MJ; Bloomer RJ; Moore CA; Schilling BK; Weiss LW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Mar; 28(3):630-5. PubMed ID: 23860285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of an increasing versus constant crank rate on peak physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry.
    Price MJ; Bottoms L; Smith PM; Nicholettos A
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 21154011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of two different methods of anaerobic capacity assessment in sedentary young men.
    Klasnja A; Drapsin M; Lukac D; Drid P; Obadov S; Grujić N
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Mar; 67(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 20361697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aerobic power and peak power of elite America's Cup sailors.
    Neville V; Pain MT; Folland JP
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2009 May; 106(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 19234715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical work capacity in dynamic exercise with differing muscle masses in healthy young and older men.
    Aminoff T; Smolander J; Korhonen O; Louhevaara V
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1996; 73(1-2):180-5. PubMed ID: 8861689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of a 3-min all-out Arm Crank Ergometer Exercise Test.
    Flueck JL; Lienert M; Schaufelberger F; Perret C
    Int J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 36(10):809-13. PubMed ID: 26038881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of two anaerobic test measurement systems using an upper body Wingate test.
    Talbot C; Kay TD; Walker N; Price MJ
    Res Sports Med; 2014; 22(3):265-75. PubMed ID: 24950114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arm-cranking muscle power and arm isometric muscle strength are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in men.
    Metter EJ; Talbot LA; Schrager M; Conwit RA
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2004 Feb; 96(2):814-21. PubMed ID: 14555682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of acceptable physical work loads based on responses to prolonged arm and leg exercise.
    Aminoff T; Smolander J; Korhonen O; Louhevaara V
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jan; 41(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 9468809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of previous dynamic arm exercise on power output during repeated maximal sprint cycling.
    Bogdanis GC; Nevill ME; Lakomy HK
    J Sports Sci; 1994 Aug; 12(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 7932946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.