BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21912876)

  • 1. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer.
    Collinson FJ; Jayne DG; Pigazzi A; Tsang C; Barrie JM; Edlin R; Garbett C; Guillou P; Holloway I; Howard H; Marshall H; McCabe C; Pavitt S; Quirke P; Rivers CS; Brown JM
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2012 Feb; 27(2):233-41. PubMed ID: 21912876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection.
    Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
    Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.
    Melich G; Hong YK; Kim J; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Sender Liberman A; Min BS
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 25030474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea.
    Baek SJ; Kim SH; Cho JS; Shin JW; Kim J
    World J Surg; 2012 Nov; 36(11):2722-9. PubMed ID: 22855217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
    Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.
    Ramsay C; Pickard R; Robertson C; Close A; Vale L; Armstrong N; Barocas DA; Eden CG; Fraser C; Gurung T; Jenkinson D; Jia X; Lam TB; Mowatt G; Neal DE; Robinson MC; Royle J; Rushton SP; Sharma P; Shirley MD; Soomro N
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(41):1-313. PubMed ID: 23127367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic versus laparoscopic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer.
    Baek SJ; Al-Asari S; Jeong DH; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Kim NK
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4157-63. PubMed ID: 23708725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: an observational single hospital study of 300 cases.
    Del Gutiérrez Delgado MP; Mera Velasco S; Turiño Luque JD; González Poveda I; Ruiz López M; Santoyo Santoyo J
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 33743145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
    Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    D'Annibale A; Pernazza G; Monsellato I; Pende V; Lucandri G; Mazzocchi P; Alfano G
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 23292566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes.
    Ghezzi TL; Luca F; Valvo M; Corleta OC; Zuccaro M; Cenciarelli S; Biffi R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1072-9. PubMed ID: 24646748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic assistance may reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ortiz-Oshiro E; Sánchez-Egido I; Moreno-Sierra J; Pérez CF; Díaz JS; Fernández-Represa JÁ
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Sep; 8(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 22438060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes.
    Saklani AP; Lim DR; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Dec; 28(12):1689-98. PubMed ID: 23948968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic surgery: colon and rectum.
    Baek SK; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A
    Cancer J; 2013; 19(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 23528722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.