130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21913380)
1. [Survey of carbon fiber reinforced plastic orthoses and occupational and medical problems based on a questionnaire administered to companies involved in the manufacture of prosthetics and orthotics].
Kaneshiro Y; Furuta N; Makino K; Wada F; Hachisuka K
J UOEH; 2011 Sep; 33(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 21913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carbon fibre reinforced plastic applied to prosthetics and orthotics.
Nelham RL
J Biomed Eng; 1981 Oct; 3(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 7031367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review on the orthotics and prosthetics and the potential of kenaf composites as alternative materials for ankle-foot orthosis.
Shahar FS; Hameed Sultan MT; Lee SH; Jawaid M; Md Shah AU; Safri SNA; Sivasankaran PN
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Nov; 99():169-185. PubMed ID: 31357064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer automated design and computer automated manufacture.
Brncick M
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2000 Aug; 11(3):701-13. PubMed ID: 10989487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthoses of ventilative plastics.
Nagata H; Onomura T; Tominaga A; Kawamura I
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1991 Dec; 15(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 1780221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fiber reinforced composites for orthotics, prosthetics and mobility aids.
McFarland SR; Laenger CJ; Francis PH; Ziperman HH
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1975; 11():151-5. PubMed ID: 1125368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Foot orthosis prescription habits of Australian and New Zealand podiatric physicians.
Landorf K; Keenan AM; Rushworth RL
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2001 Apr; 91(4):174-83. PubMed ID: 11319247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical application of carbon fibre reinforced plastic leg orthosis for polio survivors and its advantages and disadvantages.
Hachisuka K; Makino K; Wada F; Saeki S; Yoshimoto N; Arai M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Aug; 30(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 16990223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A functional comparison of conventional knee-ankle-foot orthoses and a microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis system based on biomechanical parameters.
Schmalz T; Pröbsting E; Auberger R; Siewert G
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 25249381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Compatibility of cervical spine braces with MR imaging: a study of nine nonferrous devices.
Clayman DA; Murakami ME; Vines FS
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1990; 11(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 2107723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of custom-moulded ankle orthosis with hinged joints and off-the-shelf ankle braces in preventing ankle sprain in lateral cutting movements.
Lee WC; Kobayashi T; Choy BT; Leung AK
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 22354884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orthotic use for CMC osteoarthritis: Variations among different health professionals in Brazil.
de Almeida PH; MacDermid JC; Pontes TB; Dos Santos-Couto-Paz CC; da Mota LM; Matheus JP
J Hand Ther; 2016; 29(4):440-450. PubMed ID: 27771214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multisite Evaluation of a Custom Energy-Storing Carbon Fiber Orthosis for Patients with Residual Disability After Lower-Limb Trauma.
Potter BK; Sheu RG; Stinner D; Fergason J; Hsu JR; Kuhn K; Owens JG; Rivera J; Shawen SB; Wilken JM; DeSanto J; Huang Y; Scharfstein DO; MacKenzie EJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Oct; 100(20):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 30334889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Face-protective orthosis in sport-related injuries.
Ghoseiri K; Ghoseiri G; Bavi A; Ghoseiri R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 23144162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of orthoses in the treatment of idiopathic toe walking: A randomized controlled trial.
Herrin K; Geil M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 25628380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of plastic/metal and leather/metal knee-ankle-foot orthoses.
Krebs DE; Edelstein JE; Fishman S
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Aug; 67(4):175-85. PubMed ID: 3401365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT/MR imaging: a design tool for custom orthosis.
Eldeeb H; Asfour S; Boubekri N
Disabil Rehabil; 2000 Sep 10-20; 22(13-14):583-90. PubMed ID: 11052207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orthotic survey. Preliminary results.
Moraros J; Hodge W
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1993 Mar; 83(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 8468695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated 3D-printed finger orthosis versus manual orthosis preparation by occupational therapy students: Preparation time, product weight, and user satisfaction.
Portnoy S; Barmin N; Elimelech M; Assaly B; Oren S; Shanan R; Levanon Y
J Hand Ther; 2020; 33(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 32423844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical acceptance, reasons for rejection, and reduction of in-shoe peak pressure with interdigital silicone orthoses.
Illgner U; Budny T; Hoyer M; Wetz HH
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014; 104(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 24504574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
