120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21913983)
41. Diltiazem therapy for symptoms associated with nutcracker esophagus.
Cattau EL; Castell DO; Johnson DA; Spurling TJ; Hirszel R; Chobanian SJ; Richter JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Mar; 86(3):272-6. PubMed ID: 1998307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The clinical significance of hypercontractile peristalsis: comparison of high-resolution manometric features, demographics, symptom presentation, and response to therapy in patients with Jackhammer esophagus versus Nutcracker esophagus.
Al-Qaisi MT; Siddiki HA; Crowell MD; Burdick GE; Fleischer DE; Ramirez FC; Vela MF
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 28881883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Exaggerated smooth muscle contraction segments on esophageal high-resolution manometry: prevalence and clinical relevance.
Mello MD; Duraiswamy S; Price LH; Li Y; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 25394785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: an alternate method to assess esophageal transit.
Hila A; Chowdhury N; Hajar N; Castell DO
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2011; 45(10):862-6. PubMed ID: 21857530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Nutcracker esophagus: demographic, clinical features, and esophageal tests in 115 patients.
Lufrano R; Heckman MG; Diehl N; DeVault KR; Achem SR
Dis Esophagus; 2015 Jan; 28(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24251375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Manometric abnormalities and gastroesophageal reflux disease in the morbidly obese.
Hong D; Khajanchee YS; Pereira N; Lockhart B; Patterson EJ; Swanstrom LL
Obes Surg; 2004; 14(6):744-9. PubMed ID: 15318976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hypercontractile esophagus: Clinical context and motors findings in high resolution manometry.
Martín-Domínguez V; Pérez-Fernández MT; Marinero A; Jusué-Irurita V; Caldas M; Santander C
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2015 May; 107(5):274-9. PubMed ID: 25952802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Manometric assessment of Heller-Dor operation for esophageal achalasia.
Pandolfo N; Bortolotti M; Spigno L; Bozzano PL; Mattioli FP
Hepatogastroenterology; 1996; 43(7):160-6. PubMed ID: 8682455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effect of age on the key parameters in the Chicago classification: a study using high-resolution esophageal manometry in asymptomatic normal individuals.
Jung KW; Jung HY; Myung SJ; Kim SO; Lee J; Yoon IJ; Seo SY; Lee JH; Kim DH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Murray JA; Romero Y; Kim JH
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):246-57. PubMed ID: 25521290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. An audit of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance manometry in the assessment of dysphagia.
Burgess NG; Wyeth JW
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Apr; 26 Suppl 3():79-82. PubMed ID: 21443716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Relationship between pressure wave amplitude and esophageal bolus clearance assessed by combined manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement.
Nguyen NQ; Tippett M; Smout AJ; Holloway RH
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2476-84. PubMed ID: 17029613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Esophageal motor responses to increasing adjustment of an implanted gastric band.
Burgerhart JS; Aarts EO; van de Meeberg PC; Berends FJ; Siersema PD; Smout AJ
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2013 Jul; 25(7):587-e461. PubMed ID: 23534401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The hypercontractile esophagus: Still a tough nut to crack.
Savarino E; Smout AJPM
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2020 Nov; 32(11):e14010. PubMed ID: 33043556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Applying the Chicago Classification criteria of esophageal motility to a pediatric cohort: effects of patient age and size.
Singendonk MM; Kritas S; Cock C; Ferris L; McCall L; Rommel N; van Wijk MP; Benninga MA; Moore D; Omari TI
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Sep; 26(9):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25053225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Ineffective motility in lower third of esophagus. Length of involved esophagus and severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Icaza ME; Soto JC; Pedroza J; Valdovinos MA
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2003; 68(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12940097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Increased occurrence of esophageal hypermotility disorders in patients with arterial hypertension].
Adamek RJ; Bock S; Szymanski C; Hagemann D; Pfaffenbach B
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1998 Mar; 123(12):341-6. PubMed ID: 9551037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Chicago Classification in pediatric high-resolution esophageal manometry recordings.
Singendonk MM; Smits MJ; Heijting IE; van Wijk MP; Nurko S; Rosen R; Weijenborg PW; Abu-Assi R; Hoekman DR; Kuizenga-Wessel S; Seiboth G; Benninga MA; Omari TI; Kritas S
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Feb; 27(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25521418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Trends in diagnoses after implementation of the Chicago classification for esophageal motility disorders (V3.0) for high-resolution manometry studies.
Laing P; Bress AP; Fang J; Peterson K; Adler DG; Gawron AJ
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-6. PubMed ID: 28881880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function.
Rengarajan A; Drapekin J; Patel A; Gyawali CP
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1836-1843. PubMed ID: 27353018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Nonspecific motility disorders, irritable esophagus, and chest pain.
Krarup AL; Liao D; Gregersen H; Drewes AM; Hejazi RA; McCallum RW; Vega KJ; Frazzoni M; Frazzoni L; Clarke JO; Achem SR
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2013 Oct; 1300():96-109. PubMed ID: 24117637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
