510 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21914145)
1. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
Grise-Dulac A; Saad A; Abitbol O; Febbraro JL; Azan E; Moulin-Tyrode C; Gatinel D
J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
Yenerel NM; Gorgun E; Kucumen RB; Oral D; Dinc UA; Ciftci F
Cornea; 2011 Sep; 30(9):983-6. PubMed ID: 21829105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of ocular response analyzer.
Goebels SC; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Aug; 37(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 22587394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.
del Buey MA; Cristóbal JA; Ascaso FJ; Lavilla L; Lanchares E
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3199-202. PubMed ID: 19255149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos.
Altan C; Kara N; Baz O; Satana B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 22399691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin-C on corneal biomechanical features.
Zare M; Feizi S; Azimzadeh A; Esfandiari H
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Jun; 37(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 22577762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty on corneal biomechanics.
Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 94(6):e501-4. PubMed ID: 26749244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.
Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Hagishima M; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 248(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19693527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with progressive normal-tension glaucoma.
Park JH; Jun RM; Choi KR
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 99(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 25555704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
