These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21914550)
1. Application of TruScreen in detecting ASCUS patients. Li W; Guo Y; Niu H; Jin S; Wang L Asian Pac J Trop Med; 2011 Aug; 4(8):669-71. PubMed ID: 21914550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of TruScreen for detecting CIN2+ in women with ThinPrep cytologic test results indicating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Yang X; He L; Xiao X; Yan L; Shi L; Ren Z; Cai H; Fu C Future Oncol; 2023 Dec; 19(37):2493-2504. PubMed ID: 38054304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of human papillomavirus in screening for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions. Wang JL; Yang YZ; Dong WW; Sun J; Tao HT; Li RX; Hu Y Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(5):2979-82. PubMed ID: 23803065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Pap test in combination with ThinPrep cytological test in screening for cervical cancer. Chen H; Shu HM; Chang ZL; Wang ZF; Yao HH; Zhu HM; Lu TM; Ma QY; Yang BL Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1651-5. PubMed ID: 22799383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance. Yang M; Zachariah S J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study. Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H]. Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases. Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Unified methods for vaginal cytological diagnosis are required. Accuracy of the ASCUS respective CIN I compared]. Seidal T; Karakostova P Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):826-8. PubMed ID: 10741022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the human papillomavirus test in combination with the Papanicolaou test useful for management of patients with diagnoses of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions? Lee NW; Kim D; Park JT; Kim A Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Nov; 125(11):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11698001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of a real-time optoelectronic device in cervical cancer screening. Wei Y; Wang W; Cheng M; Hong Z; Gu L; Niu J; Di W; Qiu L Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():182-186. PubMed ID: 34625339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracellular human papillomavirus E6, E7 mRNA quantification predicts CIN 2+ in cervical biopsies better than Papanicolaou screening for women regardless of age. Pierry D; Weiss G; Lack B; Chen V; Fusco J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Aug; 136(8):956-60. PubMed ID: 22849745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Combining high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test and cytological test to detect early cervical dysplasia]. Qian DY; Cen JM; Wang D; Zeng RH; Lin AH; Shu YH; Hong DH; Huang ZH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 16635326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear. Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibilities of TruScreen for primary cervical cancer screening: a self-controlled study. Long S; Lei W; Feng Y; Lv D; Cai Y; Yang P Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jul; 288(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 23296464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical study on cervix biopsy guided by colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical diseases in pregnant women]. Wang T; Wu YM; Song F; Zhu L; Li BZ; Hao X; Kong WM; Duan W; Fan L; Zhang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):497-500. PubMed ID: 21029600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont. Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy. Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]