134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21914550)
1. Application of TruScreen in detecting ASCUS patients.
Li W; Guo Y; Niu H; Jin S; Wang L
Asian Pac J Trop Med; 2011 Aug; 4(8):669-71. PubMed ID: 21914550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of TruScreen for detecting CIN2+ in women with ThinPrep cytologic test results indicating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Yang X; He L; Xiao X; Yan L; Shi L; Ren Z; Cai H; Fu C
Future Oncol; 2023 Dec; 19(37):2493-2504. PubMed ID: 38054304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of human papillomavirus in screening for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.
Wang JL; Yang YZ; Dong WW; Sun J; Tao HT; Li RX; Hu Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(5):2979-82. PubMed ID: 23803065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Pap test in combination with ThinPrep cytological test in screening for cervical cancer.
Chen H; Shu HM; Chang ZL; Wang ZF; Yao HH; Zhu HM; Lu TM; Ma QY; Yang BL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(4):1651-5. PubMed ID: 22799383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Is it possible to define a better ASCUS class in cervicovaginal screening? A review of 187 cases.
Guerrini L; Sama D; Visani M; Cotignoli T; Sintoni C; Maioli P; Lanzanova G; Schincaglia P
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 11480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Unified methods for vaginal cytological diagnosis are required. Accuracy of the ASCUS respective CIN I compared].
Seidal T; Karakostova P
Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(8):826-8. PubMed ID: 10741022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the human papillomavirus test in combination with the Papanicolaou test useful for management of patients with diagnoses of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions?
Lee NW; Kim D; Park JT; Kim A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Nov; 125(11):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11698001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of a real-time optoelectronic device in cervical cancer screening.
Wei Y; Wang W; Cheng M; Hong Z; Gu L; Niu J; Di W; Qiu L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():182-186. PubMed ID: 34625339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracellular human papillomavirus E6, E7 mRNA quantification predicts CIN 2+ in cervical biopsies better than Papanicolaou screening for women regardless of age.
Pierry D; Weiss G; Lack B; Chen V; Fusco J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Aug; 136(8):956-60. PubMed ID: 22849745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of features indicating progression in atypical squamous cells with undetermined significance: human papillomavirus typing and DNA ploidy analysis from liquid-based cytologic samples.
Bollmann R; Méhes G; Torka R; Speich N; Schmitt C; Bollmann M
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 12704691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Combining high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test and cytological test to detect early cervical dysplasia].
Qian DY; Cen JM; Wang D; Zeng RH; Lin AH; Shu YH; Hong DH; Huang ZH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 16635326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibilities of TruScreen for primary cervical cancer screening: a self-controlled study.
Long S; Lei W; Feng Y; Lv D; Cai Y; Yang P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jul; 288(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 23296464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical study on cervix biopsy guided by colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical diseases in pregnant women].
Wang T; Wu YM; Song F; Zhu L; Li BZ; Hao X; Kong WM; Duan W; Fan L; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):497-500. PubMed ID: 21029600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
