These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21914922)

  • 1. [Power and study size (what's wrong in post hoc power evaluation)].
    Catelan D; Biggeri A; Barbone F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(3-4):236-40. PubMed ID: 21914922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculations for evaluating a diagnostic test when the gold standard is missing at random.
    Kosinski AS; Chen Y; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1572-9. PubMed ID: 20552570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Calculation of confidence intervals for a finite population size.
    Julious SA
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 30411472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
    Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explorations in statistics: power.
    Curran-Everett D
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 20522895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of multiple testing procedures for the gold standard non-inferiority trial.
    Röhmel J; Pigeot I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):911-26. PubMed ID: 20721781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P values and the probability of being right and wrong.
    Gibbs NM
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Nov; 38(6):992-3. PubMed ID: 21226426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach.
    Peacock JL; Sauzet O; Ewings SM; Kerry SM
    Stat Med; 2012 Nov; 31(26):3089-103. PubMed ID: 22865598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment on 'New confidence bounds for QT studies' by Dennis D. Boos, David Hoffman, Robert Kringle and Ji Zhang, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:3801-3817.
    Tsong Y; Zhang J; Zhong J
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2936-8; author reply 2938. PubMed ID: 19777537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size and power calculation for molecular biology studies.
    Jung SH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 620():203-18. PubMed ID: 20652505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical inference for tumor growth inhibition T/C ratio.
    Wu J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):954-64. PubMed ID: 20721784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post hoc power calculations.
    Wallace DK; Melia M
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):2098; author reply 2098-9. PubMed ID: 19068383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal and most exact confidence intervals for person parameters in item response theory models.
    Doebler A; Doebler P; Holling H
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jan; 78(1):98-115. PubMed ID: 25107520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed?
    Levine M; Ensom MH
    Pharmacotherapy; 2001 Apr; 21(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 11310512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comments on 'Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis' by JJ Shuster, Statistics in Medicine 2009; 26, Published online, DOI: 10.1002/sim.3607.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2963-5; author reply 2965-6. PubMed ID: 21104939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power calculations in genetic studies.
    Evans DM; Purcell S
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2012 Jun; 2012(6):664-74. PubMed ID: 22661434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient experimental design for binary matched pairs data.
    Lennox KP; Sherman M
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2952-66. PubMed ID: 19691023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size planning for survival prediction with focus on high-dimensional data.
    Götte H; Zwiener I
    Stat Med; 2013 Feb; 32(5):787-807. PubMed ID: 22859340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological sheet n°1: How to calculate the size of a sample for an observational study?
    Serhier Z; Bendahhou K; Ben Abdelaziz A; Bennani MO
    Tunis Med; 2020 Jan; 98(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 32395771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size calculations for controlling the distribution of false discovery proportion in microarray experiments.
    Oura T; Matsui S; Kawakami K
    Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):694-705. PubMed ID: 19628638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.