These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21915671)

  • 1. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of correlated sources in EEG using combination of beamforming and surface Laplacian methods.
    Murzin V; Fuchs A; Scott Kelso JA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Aug; 218(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 23769770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biophysically detailed forward modeling of the neural origin of EEG and MEG signals.
    Næss S; Halnes G; Hagen E; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Einevoll GT; Ness TV
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117467. PubMed ID: 33075556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.
    Lee AK; Larson E; Maddox RK
    J Vis Exp; 2012 Oct; (68):e4262. PubMed ID: 23128363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
    Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
    Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
    Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
    Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation.
    Ahlfors SP; Han J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Sep; 23(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 20640882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A framework for the design of flexible cross-talk functions for spatial filtering of EEG/MEG data: DeFleCT.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1642-53. PubMed ID: 23616402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG source localization.
    Michel CM; He B
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():85-101. PubMed ID: 31277878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of improved MEG-MRI co-registration on MEG connectivity analysis.
    Chella F; Marzetti L; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L; Ilmoniemi RJ; Romani GL; Pizzella V
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():354-367. PubMed ID: 31029868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.