BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21916216)

  • 1. [Application of simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance recordings for examination of central auditory system--preliminary results].
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Wolak T; Piatkowska-Janko E; Naumczyk P; Bogorodzki P; Senderski A; Ganc M; Skarzyński H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2011; 65(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 21916216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Towards neural correlates of auditory stimulus processing: a simultaneous auditory evoked potentials and functional magnetic resonance study using an odd-ball paradigm.
    Milner R; Rusiniak M; Lewandowska M; Wolak T; Ganc M; Piątkowska-Janko E; Bogorodzki P; Skarżyński H
    Med Sci Monit; 2014 Jan; 20():35-46. PubMed ID: 24413019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
    Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EEG signatures of auditory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans.
    Mayhew SD; Dirckx SG; Niazy RK; Iannetti GD; Wise RG
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):849-64. PubMed ID: 19591945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self vs. other: neural correlates underlying agent identification based on unimodal auditory information as revealed by electrotomography (sLORETA).
    Justen C; Herbert C; Werner K; Raab M
    Neuroscience; 2014 Feb; 259():25-34. PubMed ID: 24295635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional neuroanatomy of auditory mismatch processing: an event-related fMRI study of duration-deviant oddballs.
    Schall U; Johnston P; Todd J; Ward PB; Michie PT
    Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):729-36. PubMed ID: 14568447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of human auditory association cortex to the omission of an expected acoustic event.
    Hughes HC; Darcey TM; Barkan HI; Williamson PD; Roberts DW; Aslin CH
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1073-89. PubMed ID: 11352613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneous 3-T fMRI and high-density recording of human auditory evoked potentials.
    Scarff CJ; Reynolds A; Goodyear BG; Ponton CW; Dort JC; Eggermont JJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):1129-42. PubMed ID: 15528112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. N1 Magnitude of Auditory Evoked Potentials and Spontaneous Functional Connectivity Between Bilateral Heschl's Gyrus Are Coupled at Interindividual Level.
    Tan A; Hu L; Tu Y; Chen R; Hung YS; Zhang Z
    Brain Connect; 2016 Jul; 6(6):496-504. PubMed ID: 27105665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection.
    Mulert C; Jäger L; Schmitt R; Bussfeld P; Pogarell O; Möller HJ; Juckel G; Hegerl U
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 15109999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.
    Baumann S; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2238-49. PubMed ID: 18457513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial resolution of fMRI in the human parasylvian cortex: comparison of somatosensory and auditory activation.
    Ozcan M; Baumgärtner U; Vucurevic G; Stoeter P; Treede RD
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):877-87. PubMed ID: 15808988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm.
    Liebenthal E; Ellingson ML; Spanaki MV; Prieto TE; Ropella KM; Binder JR
    Neuroimage; 2003 Aug; 19(4):1395-404. PubMed ID: 12948697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-frequency analysis of resting state and evoked EEG data recorded at higher magnetic fields up to 9.4 T.
    Abbasi O; Dammers J; Arrubla J; Warbrick T; Butz M; Neuner I; Shah NJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Nov; 255():1-11. PubMed ID: 26213220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential deviant probability effects on two hierarchical levels of the auditory novelty system.
    López-Caballero F; Zarnowiec K; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():1-9. PubMed ID: 27497593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 65.