These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21916560)

  • 1. A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study.
    Audenaert E; De Smedt K; Gelaude F; Clijmans T; Pattyn C; Geebelen B
    Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(6):304-9. PubMed ID: 21916560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Functionality and accuracy of a fluoroscopic navigation system in the placement of the femoral component for hip resurfacing - a cadaver study].
    Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Wirtz D; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 18561082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a patient specific femoral alignment guide for hip resurfacing.
    Olsen M; Naudie DD; Edwards MR; Sellan ME; McCalden RW; Schemitsch EH
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):590-5. PubMed ID: 24034907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for hip surface replacement arthroplasty: description and first results.
    Raaijmaakers M; Gelaude F; De Smedt K; Clijmans T; Dille J; Mulier M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Jul; 11():161. PubMed ID: 20630093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.
    Davis ET; Gallie P; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch E
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):557-60. PubMed ID: 17463131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation.
    Bailey C; Gul R; Falworth M; Zadow S; Oakeshott R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 18972176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved implantation technique for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
    Wirth CJ; Gossé F
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2006 Sep; 18(3):214-24. PubMed ID: 16953347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imageless computer navigation without pre-operative templating may lead to malpreparation of the femoral head in hip resurfacing.
    Olsen M; Davis ET; Chiu M; Gamble P; Tumia N; Boyle RA; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Oct; 91(10):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19794160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-assisted navigation in hip resurfacing arthroplasty - a single-surgeon experience.
    Shields JS; Seyler TM; Maguire C; Jinnah RH
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 19583547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates.
    Kunz M; Rudan JF; Xenoyannis GL; Ellis RE
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 19464848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple tool for the adjustment of the guide wire position in hip resurfacing.
    Nogler M; Putzer D; Mayr E
    Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():269-71. PubMed ID: 23065803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.
    Vendittoli PA; Ganapathi M; Nuño N; Plamondon D; Lavigne M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 Nov; 22(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 17870221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Fluoroscopic navigation versus conventional manual positioning of the femoral component for hip resurfacing: first experimental trial].
    Gravius S; Belei P; de la Fuente M; Müller-Rath R; Radermacher K; Christian Wirtz D; Mumme T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Aug; 53(4):204-12. PubMed ID: 18643714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Hodgson A; Helmy N; Masri BA; Greidanus NV; Inkpen KB; Duncan CP; Garbuz DS; Anglin C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):713-24. PubMed ID: 18019459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personalized Guides for Registration in Surgical Navigation.
    Dickinson AW; Rasquinha BJ; Rudan JF; Ellis RE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():98-102. PubMed ID: 27046560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of custom-made navigational template of femoral head and pilot research in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Liang J; Zhao Y; Gao X; Fang X; Xu Y; Lu S
    BMC Surg; 2020 Jun; 20(1):144. PubMed ID: 32605554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
    Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total Ankle Arthroplasty Accuracy and Reproducibility Using Preoperative CT Scan-Derived, Patient-Specific Guides.
    Berlet GC; Penner MJ; Lancianese S; Stemniski PM; Obert RM
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Jul; 35(7):665-76. PubMed ID: 24719401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of navigation in hip resurfacing with different surgeons and varying anatomy.
    Schleicher I; Haselbacher M; Mayr E; Kaiser PM; Lenze FW; Keiler A; Nogler M
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 22348660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.