BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

824 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21916790)

  • 1. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.
    Fraser S; Gagné JP; Alepins M; Dubois P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 19635945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.
    Anderson Gosselin P; Gagné JP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):944-58. PubMed ID: 21060138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing motivation changes subjective reports of listening effort and choice of coping strategy.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 24597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD.
    Michalek AM; Watson SM; Ash I; Ringleb S; Raymer A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24456181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual cues and listening effort: individual variability.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1416-30. PubMed ID: 21498576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effort Required to Comprehend a Short Documentary in Noise: A Comparison of Younger and Older Francophones.
    Tangkhpanya F; Le Carrour M; Doucet F; Gagné JP
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Oct; 28(3S):756-761. PubMed ID: 32271122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of aging on audio-visual speech integration.
    Huyse A; Leybaert J; Berthommier F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1918-31. PubMed ID: 25324091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of blurred vision on auditory-visual speech perception in younger and older adults.
    Legault I; Gagné JP; Rhoualem W; Anderson-Gosselin P
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):904-11. PubMed ID: 20874052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
    Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.